Schenck Rotec Gmbh v Universal Balancing Ltd

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Tickner and Another v Honda Motor Company Ltd and Others
• Qualcomm Incorporated (A Delaware Corporation) v Nokia Corporation (A Finnish Company)
• Adhesive Dry Mounting Company Ltd v Trapp & Company

[See more]

• Insituform Technical Services v Inliner UK
• Buhler AG v Satake UK Ltd (No 2)
• Lubrizol Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd
• Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth
• Pozzoli v BDMO
• Tyrell Inc. v BSM-Bionic Solution Management GmbH and Another
• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
• FNM Corporation v Drammock
• Folding Attic Stairs Ltd v Loft Stairs Company Ltd

CONSIDERS

• Patents Act 1977 - Articles : S-64
• Patents Act 1977 - Articles : S-3

CITED in

• F H Brundle (a private unlimited company) v Richard Perry Betafence Ltd and Another (Third Parties)
• Parainen Pearl Shipping Ltd v Kristian Gerhard Jebsen Skipsrederi as

This document cites

• Qualcomm Incorporated (A Delaware Corporation) v Nokia Corporation (A Finnish Company)
• Windsurfing International Inc. v Tabur Marine (Great Britain) Ltd
• Tickner and Another v Honda Motor Company Ltd and Others
• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
• Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth



See all quotations

• Tyrell Inc. v BSM-Bionic Solution Management GmbH and Another
• Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
• Pozzoli v BDMO
• FNM Corporation v Drammock
• The General Tire & Rubber Company v The Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Ltd and Others
• Folding Attic Stairs Ltd v Loft Stairs Company Ltd
• Lubrizol Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd
• Adhesive Dry Mounting Company Ltd v Trapp & Company
• Insituform Technical Services v Inliner UK
• Buhler AG v Satake UK Ltd (No 2)
• Patents Act 1977
• The Intellectual Property (Enforcement, etc.) Regulations 2006
• DIRECTIVE 2004/48/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (Text with EEA relevance)