Scheggia v Gradwell

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Long (Peter) & Partners v Burns
• Poole v Clarke and Company
• James v Smith (Note)

[See more]

• Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper

REFERS TO

• Re Marshall and Salt's Contract
• Drewery v Ware-Lane
• Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper

[See more]

• Ackroyd & Sons v Hasan
• Martin v Perry and Daw
• Keppel v Wheeler
• Gokal Chand-Jagan Nath (Firm) v Nand Ram Das-Atma Ram (Firm)
• Day v Singleton

APPLIES

• Midgley Estates Ltd v Hand

DISTINGUISHES

• Long (Peter) & Partners v Burns
• Dennis Reed Ltd v Goody
• Dellafiora v Lester

[See more]

• James v Smith

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1963] 3 All ER 114
• [1963] 107 SJ 572
• [1963] 1 WLR 1049

CONSIDERED in

• Dian Ann-Marie Patterson v Don Providence
• Wilkinson (A.L.) Ltd v Brown
• Coburn T. Norfleet v Prather Mcneal-Hutchison

[See more]

• Coburn T. Norfleet v Prather McNeal-Hutchison
• Dian Ann-Marie Patterson v Don Providence
• Ebanks v Symmes

REFERRED in

• Shires v Brock and another

DISTINGUISHED in

• Jaques v Lloyd D. George & Partners Ltd

This document cites

• Dellafiora v Lester
• Drewery v Ware-Lane
• Long (Peter) & Partners v Burns
• Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper
• Re Marshall and Salt's Contract



See all quotations

• Day v Singleton
• Midgley Estates Ltd v Hand
• Gokal Chand-Jagan Nath (Firm) v Nand Ram Das-Atma Ram (Firm)
• James v Smith (Note)
• Ackroyd & Sons v Hasan
• Keppel v Wheeler
• Martin v Perry and Daw
• James v Smith
• Dennis Reed Ltd v Goody
• Long (Peter) & Partners v Burns
• Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper
• Poole v Clarke and Company