The "Scarlet Letter laws" of the 1990s: a response to critics.

This document cites

• New York - Werfel v. Fitzgerald
• Louisiana - 94 2568 La.App. 1 Cir. 2/23/96, State v. Calhoun
• Federal Cases - Addington v. Texas
• Federal Cases - Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. City of Philadelphia
• New York - New York Post Corp. v. Leibowitz



See all quotations

• New York - People v. McNair
• Federal Cases - Trade Waste Management Ass'n, Inc. v. Hughey
• Federal Cases - Austin v. United States
• Federal Cases - Paul v. Davis, Iii
• Federal Cases - National Labor Relations Board v. Fruit and Vegetable Packers and Warehousemen, Local 760, 88
• Federal Cases - Kirk v. Mullen
• Federal Cases - United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee For Freedom of the Press
• Federal Cases - United States v. Halper
• Federal Cases - Trop v. Dulles
• Federal Cases - U.S. v. Huss, 92-30372
• New Jersey - Doe v. Poritz
• Federal Cases - Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group
• Federal Cases - Moore v. Sims
• Federal Cases - Bae v. Shalala
• Federal Cases - Nilson v. Layton City, 94-4077
• Federal Cases - Schall v. Martin Abrams v. Martin
• Federal Cases - Sturm v. Clark
• Massachusetts - Opinion of the Justices to the Senate
• Federal Cases - De Veau v. Braisted
• Kansas - State v. Myers
• Federal Cases - Doe v. City of New York
• Federal Cases - Cox Broadcasting Corporation v. Cohn 8212 938
• Federal Cases - United States v. Ward
• Federal Cases - Manocchio v. Kusserow
• Federal Cases - United States v. Salerno
• Federal Cases - Jackson v. Indiana 8212 5009
• Federal Cases - United States v. Brown
• Louisiana - 93 1361 La.App. 1 Cir. 5/20/94, State v. Babin
• Federal Cases - U.S. v. Ursery
• Federal Cases - Rowe v. Burton, A94-206 Civil.