Scanfuture (UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2)
• Hoani Te Heuheu Tukino v Aotea District Maori Land Board
• Starrs v Procurator Fiscal, Linlithgow

DOES NOT APPLY

• Betts and Others v Brintel Helicopters Ltd (trading as British International Helicopters) and Another
• Charlton v Charlton Thermosystems (Romsey) Ltd

CONSIDERS

• R v Spear; R v Hastie; R v Boyd; R v Williams and nine other defendants (Conjoined appeals)
• Director General of Fair Trading v Proprietary Association of Great Britain; Re Medicaments and Related Classes of Goods (No 2)

CITES

• RCO Support Services Ltd v Unison
• Eccles v Ireland

FOLLOWS

• Smith v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 26/04/2001 Times Law Reports
• [2001] ICR 1096

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Scanfuture (UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry

This document cites

• RCO Support Services Ltd v Unison
• Eccles v Ireland
• R v Spear; R v Hastie; R v Boyd; R v Williams and nine other defendants (Conjoined appeals)
• R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2)
• Hoani Te Heuheu Tukino v Aotea District Maori Land Board



See all quotations

• Smith v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
• Betts and Others v Brintel Helicopters Ltd (trading as British International Helicopters) and Another
• Charlton v Charlton Thermosystems (Romsey) Ltd
• Director General of Fair Trading v Proprietary Association of Great Britain; Re Medicaments and Related Classes of Goods (No 2)
• Starrs v Procurator Fiscal, Linlithgow