Extract
Al Sadik v Investcorp Bank B.S.C. and Others
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CONSIDERED in
-
The Companies Act (2016 Revision) and Trina Solar Ltd Between (1) Maso Capital Investments Ltd (2) Blackwell Partners LLC – Series A Appellants v Trina Solar Ltd Respondent
-
The Companies Act (2022 Revision) and FGL Holdings
-
Between: (1) Arnage Holdings Ltd (2) Brooklands Holdings Ltd (3) East Farthing Holdings Ltd (4) Ms Katia Rabello (5) Mr Fernando Toledo Plaintiffs v Walkers (A Firm) Defendant
[See more]
-
Kuwait Ports Authority v Port Link GP Ltd
-
BETWEEN: (1) Arnage Holdings Ltd (2) Brooklands Holdings Ltd (3) East Farthing Holdings Ltd (4) Ms Katia Rabello (5) Mr Fernando Toledo Plaintiffs v Walkers (A Firm) Defendant
-
Valley Health System v Augusta Healthcare, Inc.
-
The Companies Act (2022 Revision) and Virginia Solution SPC Ltd Between: Valley Health System Petitioner v Augusta Healthcare, Inc. Respondent
-
Cayman Shores Development Ltd v The Registrar of Lands
-
Abdulhameed Dhia Jafar v Abraaj Holdings
-
Between: (1) Kuwait Ports Authority (2) The Public Institution for Social Security Plaintiffs v (1) Port Link GP Ltd (2) Mark Eric Williams (3) Wellspring Capital Group, Inc. (4) KGL Investment Company Asia Defendants
-
Between: Abdulhameed Dhia Jafar Plaintiff v (1) Abraaj Holdings (in official liquidation) (2) GHF General Partner Ltd (in its capacity as general partner of GHF Fund LP (formerly Abraaj Growth Markets Health Fund LP) and GHF Fund (B) LP (formerly Abraaj Growth Markets Health Fund (B) LP)) (3) The GHF Group Ltd (formerly The Abraaj Healthcare Group Ltd) (4) Abraaj General Partner VIII Ltd (in its capacity as general partner of Neoma Private Equity Fund IV LP (formerly known as Abraaj Private Equity Fund IV LP)) Defendants
-
The Poulton Family Trust Between: (1) Michele Alexia Canham (2) James Alexander Poulton (3) Nicholas James Poulton (4) James Michael Poulton (5) Daisy Elizabeth Houghton-Poulton Plaintiffs v (1) Cutty Sark Land Company (2) Deborah McMullan Poulton (3) Wilson Malcolm McMullan (4) Christine Jane McMullan (5) Cayman National Trust Company Ltd (6) CNT (Nominees) Ltd Defendants
-
Between Scully Royalty Ltd First Appellant / First Defendant MFC 2017 II Ltd Second Appellant / Fifth Defendant v Raiffeisen Bank International AG Respondent / Plaintiff
-
An Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd under section 140(1) of the Registered Land Act (Revised) (the Act ) or alternatively under section 96 of the Act and an Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd, pursuant to section 96 of the Act, that certain rights under certain restrictive agreements registered against Block 12D 108 and Block 12C 27 be wholly or partially extinguished or modified Between: (1) Cayman Shores Development Ltd (2) Palm Sunshine Ltd Plaintiffs v (1) The Registrar of Lands (2) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 79 (known as Lion's Court) (3) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 147 (known as Regent's Court) (4) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 215 (known as King's Court) (5) The Britann
-
An Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd under section 140(1) of the Registered Land Act (Revised) (the Act ) or alternatively under section 96 of the Act and an Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd, pursuant to section 96 of the Act, that certain rights under certain restrictive agreements registered against Block 12D 108 and Block 12C 27 be wholly or partially extinguished or modified Between: (1) Cayman Shores Development Ltd (2) Palm Sunshine Ltd Plaintiffs v (1) The Registrar of Lands (2) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 79 (known as Lion's Court) (3) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 147 (known as Regent's Court) (4) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 215 (known as King's Court) (5) The Britann
-
An Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd under section 140(1) of the Registered Land Act (Revised) (the Act ) or alternatively under section 96 of the Act and an Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd, pursuant to section 96 of the Act, that certain rights under certain restrictive agreements registered against Block 12D 108 and Block 12C 27 be wholly or partially extinguished or modified Between: (1) Cayman Shores Development Ltd (2) Palm Sunshine Ltd Plaintiffs v (1) The Registrar of Lands (2) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 79 (known as Lion's Court) (3) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 147 (known as Regent's Court) (4) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 215 (known as King's Court) (5) The Britann
-
An Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd under section 140(1) of the Registered Land Act (Revised) (the Act ) or alternatively under section 96 of the Act and an Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd, pursuant to section 96 of the Act, that certain rights under certain restrictive agreements registered against Block 12D 108 and Block 12C 27 be wholly or partially extinguished or modified Between: (1) Cayman Shores Development Ltd (2) Palm Sunshine Ltd Plaintiffs v (1) The Registrar of Lands (2) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 79 (known as Lion's Court) (3) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 147 (known as Regent's Court) (4) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 215 (known as King's Court) (5) The Britann
-
The Poulton Family Trust Between: (1) Michele Alexia Canham (2) James Alexander Poulton (3) Nicholas James Poulton (4) James Michael Poulton (5) Daisy Elizabeth Houghton-Poulton Plaintiffs v (1) Cutty Sark Land Company (2) Deborah McMullan Poulton (3) Wilson Malcolm McMullan (4) Christine Jane McMullan (5) Cayman National Trust Company Ltd (6) CNT (Nominees) Ltd Defendants
-
The Companies Act (2016 Revision) and Trina Solar Ltd Between (1) Maso Capital Investments Ltd (2) Blackwell Partners LLC – Series A Appellants v Trina Solar Ltd Respondent
-
IGCF SPV 21 Ltd Applicant/Plaintiff v (1) AL Jomaih Power Ltd (2) Denham Investment Ltd Respondents/Defendants
-
The Companies Act (2021 Revision) and Principal Investing Fund I Ltd and Long View II Ltd and Global Fixed Income Fund I Ltd Credit Suisse London Nominees Ltd Petitioner v Principal Investing Fund I Ltd Long View II Ltd Global Fixed Income Fund I Ltd First Respondents and Floreat Principal Investment Management Ltd LV II Investment Management Ltd Floreat Investment Management Ltd Second Respondents
-
The Companies Act (2023 Revision) and Grand Court Rules, Order 67, Rule 6 Between: The Armand Hammer Foundation, Inc. Plaintiff v (1) Hammer International Foundation (2) Mark Alfano (3) Samuel 1 Ltd (4) R Alexander (5) Misty Hammer (6) Jeff Katofsky (7) Randall Barton (8) Raisha Park (9) Cecil Kyte (10) Alexander Menzel (11) The Attorney-General Defendants
-
Between (1) Frabran Holdings Company Ltd (2) Husky Trading Company Ltd Plaintiffs v Daventree Trustees Ltd Defendant; Between Kestrel Stock Trading Company Ltd Plaintiff v (1) Daventree Trustees Ltd and 10 Others Defendants; Between (1) Frabran Holdings Company Ltd and 12 Others Plaintiffs v Daventree Trustees Ltd Defendant
-
The Companies Act (2021 Revision) and Principal Investing Fund I Ltd and Long View II Ltd and Global Fixed Income Fund I Ltd Credit Suisse London Nominees Ltd Petitioner v Principal Investing Fund I Ltd Long View II Ltd Global Fixed Income Fund I Ltd First Respondents and Floreat Principal Investment Management Ltd LV II Investment Management Ltd Floreat Investment Management Ltd Second Respondents