S.M. v Ireland (No.1)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Woodhouse v Consignia Plc; Steliou v Compton

APPLIES

• Henderson v Henderson. [HIGH COURT of CHANCERY]

CONSIDERS

• Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - Articles : S-62
• Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1935
• Riordan v an Taoiseach (No. 2)

[See more]

• The State (Lynch) v Cooney

CITES

• Barry v Buckley
• Carroll v Ryan
• Russell v Waterford and Limerick Railway Company

[See more]

• Nelson v Couch
• Cox v Dublin City Distillery (No.2)
• Barrow v Bankside Members Agency Ltd and Another
• Johnson v Gore Wood & Company (A Firm)
• AA v Medical Council
• Yat Tung Investment Company Ltd v Dao Heng Bank Ltd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2005] 3 JIC 1803

CONSIDERED in

• Ashcoin Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) v Moriarty Holdings Ltd (No 2)
• Arklow Holidays Ltd v Bord Pleanála and Others

REFERRED in

• Arklow Holidays Ltd v an Bord Pleanála

FOLLOWED in

• McFarlane v DPP

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• S.M. v Ireland (No.1)

REVERSED in

• S.M. v Ireland (No.1)

This document cites

---

• AA v Medical Council
• Woodhouse v Consignia Plc; Steliou v Compton
• Barry v Buckley
• Barrow v Bankside Members Agency Ltd and Another
• Carroll v Ryan



See all quotations

• The State (Lynch) v Cooney
• Henderson v Henderson. [HIGH COURT of CHANCERY]
• Cox v Dublin City Distillery (No.2)
• Nelson v Couch
• Gairy vs. Attorney General of Grenada
• Yat Tung Investment Company Ltd v Dao Heng Bank Ltd
• Russell v Waterford and Limerick Railway Company
• Riordan v an Taoiseach (No. 2)
• Offences Against the Person Act 1861
• The Rules of the Superior Courts 1986
• Johnson v Gore Wood & Company (A Firm)