Russell v Russell

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• The King against The Inhabitants of Kea
• Pryor v Pryor
• Gordon v Gordon and Granville Gordon

[See more]

• The Poulett Peerage
• Gordon v Gordon and Bell
• Anon v Anon
• Ball v Knight
• Synge v Synge
• Kensit v Rector of St. Ethelburga, Bishopsgate Within
• Rowell v Rowell
• Re Rideout's Trusts
• Gaskill v Gaskill
• Goodright's case
• The King against Luffe

CONSIDERS

• Legitimacy Declaration Act 1858
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1878 - Articles : S-4

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Russell v Russell

REVERSES

• Russell v Russell

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1924] UKHL J0530-3
• 40 TLR 713
• [1924] AC 687

CITED in

• Lindsay v Lindsay
• Clark v Clark (No. 1)
• Preston-Jones v Preston-Jones

[See more]

• Re Jenion. Jenion v Wynne
• Jackson v Jackson otherwise Prudom
• Re Leman's will Trusts—Public Trustee v Leman and Another
• Magill v Magill (Attorney General intervening)
• Re Heath, Decd
• Snowman (otherwise Bensinger) v Snowman
• Re Hamer's Estate Public Trustee v Attorney-General
• Roast v Roast
• Ettenfield v Ettenfield
• Bowen v Norman
• Stafford v Kidd
• Grubb v Grubb
• R v Hemmings
• Wood v Wood
• Frampton v Frampton & Bushell
• Farnham v Farnham otherwise Daniels
• Russell v Russell
• Goss v Goss
• M.R and Another v an tArd Chlaraitheoir and Others
• The Baronetcy of Pringle of Stichill
• S. v S
• Yukos Capital S.a.r.L (a company incorporated in the Luxembourg) v OJSC Rosneft Oil Company (a company incorporated in the Russian Federation)
• Preston-Jones v Preston-Jones

REFERRED in

• Andrews v Andrews
• Warren v Warren
• Mart v Mart

[See more]

• Inverclyde (otherwise Tripp) v Inverclyde
• Burgess otherwise Leadbitter v Burgess
• Briginshaw v Briginshaw
• Vitzdamm-Jones v Vitzdamm-Jones
• Farman v Farman
• S v S and P
• R v Carmichael
• Holland v Holland
• Morris v Morris and Morris and Manning
• Brown v Leech
• Selby v Atkins
• Antoniammal Saminathan and Another; Jambalingam Saminathan also spelt as Saminaden
• Chang Shu Hua v Goon Fook Hong (No.2)
• P (F) v P (S)
• M v F
• O.R v an tArd Chláraitheoir

CONSIDERED in

• The State v Sookraj Evans
• Mohammed v Mohammed; Cornwall v Cornwall and Oliver; Paul v Paul, Lewis v Lewis
• Laffer v Gillen

[See more]

• Rapisarda v Colladon
• Murtagh v Murtagh
• A.S. v R.B.
• K-generation Pty Ltd and Another v Liquor Licensing Court and Another
• WX v WW
• Magill v Magill

FOLLOWED in

• Piggott v Piggott
• Antoniammal Saminathan and Another; Jambalingam Saminathan also spelt as Saminaden

COMMENTED in

• Cocks v Juncken

APPLIED in

• Jones v Churme and Moreira

NOT APPLIED in

• Mulhern v Clery

This document cites

---

• Ball v Knight
• Synge v Synge
• The King against The Inhabitants of Kea
• Gordon v Gordon and Granville Gordon
• Pryor v Pryor



See all quotations

• Gaskill v Gaskill
• Goodright's case
• Kensit v Rector of St. Ethelburga, Bishopsgate Within
• Rowell v Rowell
• Russell v Russell
• The Poulett Peerage
• Re Rideout's Trusts
• Goodright ex dim. Stevens v Moss et Al
• The King against Luffe
• Gordon v Gordon and Bell
• Anon v Anon
• Legitimacy Declaration Act 1858
• Criminal Evidence Act 1898
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1878
• Evidence Further Amendment Act 1869
• Evidence Act 1851
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1857