Ruban v Attorney General

Core Citations

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• R v Smith (Roger) ; Haughton v Smith
• Mieras v Rees
• Partington v Williams

CONSIDERS

• Attorney General v Contractors Plant Service Ltd
• Davey v Lee
• Hollington v Hewthorn (F.) & Company

[See more]

• R v Bogacki

CITES

• LE CROM v CONSTABLE of ST. BRELADE [Royal Ct]
• Sangan v Attorney General

APPLIES

• DPP v Nock
• Kelly v Hogan
• R v Farrance

FOLLOWS

• R v McPherson (Andrew)
• R v Ring
• R v Shivpuri

[See more]

• Renouf v Attorney General for Jersey
• R v Brown
• R v Collins and Others
• Attorney General v Makarios
• Corby and Lewis v Le Main

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1987] JLR 204

CONSIDERED in

• Le Monnier v Attorney General

This document cites

• R v MacDonagh
• R v Smith (Roger) ; Haughton v Smith
• DPP v Nock
• R v Farrance
• R v Bogacki



See all quotations

• DPP v Stonehouse
• R v Tulloch
• Goody v Odhams Press Ltd
• AG v Paisnel
• Partington v Williams
• Davey v Lee
• Mieras v Rees
• Chatters v Burke
• R v Brown
• Hollington v Hewthorn (F.) & Company
• Attorney General v Makarios
• Corby and Lewis v Le Main
• Sangan v Attorney General
• Attorney General v Contractors Plant Service Ltd
• R v Shivpuri
• Harman v Wardrop
• R v McPherson (Andrew)
• Shaw v Knill
• Kelly v Hogan
• Renouf v Attorney General for Jersey
• R v Ring
• LE CROM v CONSTABLE of ST. BRELADE [Royal Ct]
• R v Collins and Others
• R v Richman
• Mieras v Rees
• Davey v Lee