Rose v Humbles

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Edwards (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Bairstow & Harrison

REFERS TO

• Edwards (Inspector of Taxes) v Bairstow

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Rose v Humbles

REVERSES

• Rose v Humbles

CONSIDERS

• Income Tax Act 1952 - Articles : S-64
• Civil Evidence Act 1968
• Income Tax Act 1952

CONSIDERED in

• Johnson v Walden (Inspector of Taxes); ; King v Walden (Inspector of Taxes)
• Gault v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• St. George et Al v Hayward et Al

[See more]

• Johnson v Walden (Inspector of Taxes); ; King v Walden (Inspector of Taxes)
• Sandley (t/a Bemba Sandley Management Co) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
• West Lancashire DC v Secretary of State for the Environment and Other
• Denis Paling v Ipswich Magistrates Court
• R Shane Wheeler v Police Appeals Tribunal
• The Representation of Paul
• Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj

FOLLOWED in

• Ottley v Morris (HM Inspector of Taxes)
• Ottley v Morris

CITED in

• Kowalski v Bourne
• Wright v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
• Maharani Restaurant v Commissioners of Customs and Excise

[See more]

• Denis Paling v Ipswich Magistrates Court
• The Queen (on the application of Squier) v General Medical Council

REFERRED in

• R Clinton v General Medical Council

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1972] 1 All ER 314
• 48 TC 103
• [1972] 1 WLR 33

This document cites

---

• Edwards (Inspector of Taxes) v Bairstow
• Rose v Humbles
• Edwards (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Bairstow & Harrison
• Income Tax Act 1952
• Civil Evidence Act 1968