Roger Alan Giese v The Government of the United States of America

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Salvis Auzins v Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Latvia
• Ravi Shankaran v The Government of the State of India and Another
• R (Government of the United States of America) v Bow Street Magistrates Court

[See more]

• Claudiu Camaras v Baia Mare Local Court Romania
• The Queen v Scott Crawley and Others
• The Government of the United States of America v Roger Alan Giese
• Office of the Prosecutor General of Turin v Franco Barone
• Lord Advocate (representing the Taiwanese Judicial Authorities) v Dean (Scotland)
• Henderson v Henderson. [HIGH COURT of CHANCERY]
• R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Tarling
• R (Kashamu) v Governor of Brixton Prison and Another (No 2); R (Kashamu) v Bow Street Magistrates' Court; R (Makhlulif and Another) v Bow Street Magistrates' Court
• Douglas Belbin v The Regional Court of Lille, France
• The United States of America v Roger Alan Giese
• R (Bermingham and Others) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office
• Johnson v Gore Wood & Company (A Firm)
• Public Prosecutor of Hamburg v Altun
• Antonio Troitiño Arranz v The 5th Section of the National High Court of Madrid, Spain
• The United States of America v Roger Alan Giese

CONSIDERS

• Extradition Act 2003
• Employment Act 2002

CONSIDERED in

• Judecatoria Turnu Magurele (Romania) v Sandu
• Jonas Gerulskis v The Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Lithuania
• Wei Miao v Government of the United States of America

[See more]

• Evers Gonzalez Lazo v Government of the United States of America
• Mate Konczos v Law Court in Gyor (Hungary)
• Adam Wawrzyczek v The District Court in Bielsko-Biala, Poland
• Vasile Done v Petrosani Court of Law Romania

REFERRED in

• Joao Antonio Delgardo Henriques v Judicial Authority of Portugal
• Donna Francis v Government for the United States of America
• Evers Gonzalez Lazo v Government of the United States of America

[See more]

• R Dennett v Lancashire County Council
• Mate Konczos v Law Court in Gyor (Hungary)
• Vadims Jasvins v General Prosecutor's Office Latvia
• Guy Jane v Prosecutor General's Office, Lithuania
• The Government of India v Sanjeev Kumar Chawla
• The Government of India v Arti Dhir
• Government of Turkey v Ozgur Tanis
• Nesin Kaderli v Chief Public Prosecutor's Office of Gebze, Turkey

APPLIED in

• Lorenc Sula v Public Prosecutor of the Thessaloniki Court of Appeal, Greece

CITED in

• Bacau Disrict Court, Romania v Andy-Richard Iancu
• The Government of India v Arti Dhir

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2018] 4 WLR 103

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Claudiu Camaras v Baia Mare Local Court Romania
• Lord Advocate (representing the Taiwanese Judicial Authorities) v Dean (Scotland)
• The United States of America v Roger Alan Giese
• Ravi Shankaran v The Government of the State of India and Another



See all quotations

• The United States of America v Roger Alan Giese
• Douglas Belbin v The Regional Court of Lille, France
• McBride v Scottish Police Services Authority
• Johnson v Gore Wood & Company (A Firm)
• R (Kashamu) v Governor of Brixton Prison and Another (No 2); R (Kashamu) v Bow Street Magistrates' Court; R (Makhlulif and Another) v Bow Street Magistrates' Court
• Salvis Auzins v Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Latvia
• The Queen v Scott Crawley and Others
• Antonio Troitiño Arranz v The 5th Section of the National High Court of Madrid, Spain
• The Government of the United States of America v Roger Alan Giese
• Public Prosecutor of Hamburg v Altun
• Office of the Prosecutor General of Turin v Franco Barone
• R (Bermingham and Others) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office
• Henderson v Henderson. [HIGH COURT of CHANCERY]
• R (Government of the United States of America) v Bow Street Magistrates Court
• R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Tarling
• Employment Act 2002
• Extradition Act 2003
• R v Maxwell
• R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Johnson v Gore Wood & Company (A Firm)