Richard Slade and Company Solicitors v Mr Jugmohan Boodia and Another (Respondents/Claimants)

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Re Romer & Haslam
• Adams v Al Malik
• Chamberlain v Boodle & King (Note)

[See more]

• Dr Mehrdad Rahimian and Another v Allan Janes LLP

APPLIES

• Ashfakul Bari (Claimant v Arnold Rosen (T/A Ra Rosen and Company Solicitors) (Defendant

CONSIDERS

• Dr Zoe Vlamaki (Claimant v Sookias & Sookias (Defendants
• Ralph Hume Garry (A Firm) v Gwillim
• Solicitors Act 1974

[See more]

• Solicitors Act 1974
• Solicitors Act 1974 - Articles : S-70

REVERSED in

• Jugmohan Boodia v Richard John Slade (t/a Richard Slade and Company)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2018] 1 WLR 2037

CONSIDERED in

• Laurence Sprey v Rawlison Butler LLP
• Signature Litigation LLP v Bidzina Ivanishvili
• Mr Jugmohan Boodia v Richard Slade T/A Richard Slade & Company Solicitors

[See more]

• Richard John Slade (trading as Richard Slade and Company) v Jugmohan Boodia

This document cites

• Dr Mehrdad Rahimian and Another v Allan Janes LLP
• Chamberlain v Boodle & King (Note)
• Dr Zoe Vlamaki (Claimant v Sookias & Sookias (Defendants
• Ralph Hume Garry (A Firm) v Gwillim
• Adams v Al Malik



See all quotations

• Ashfakul Bari (Claimant v Arnold Rosen (T/A Ra Rosen and Company Solicitors) (Defendant
• Re Romer & Haslam
• Solicitors Act 1974
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998