The resurgence of the marital rape exemption: the victimization of teens by their statutory rapists.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 839 F.2d 77 (2nd Cir. 1988), 185, Liberta v. Kelly
• Federal Cases - 450 U.S. 464 (1981), 79-1344, Michael M. v. Superior Court
• Federal Cases - 125 U.S. 190 (1888), Maynard v. Hill
• Alabama - 500 So.2d 1301 (Ala.Crim.App. 1986), 6 Div. 36, Merton v. State
• California - 61 Cal.2d 529, 7386, People v. Hernandez



See all quotations

• California - 34 Cal.App. 489, Crim. 703, In re Application of Kostriken
• California - 255 Cal.App.2d 229, 12896, People v. Caldwell
• California - 212 Cal.App.3d 780, B034853, People v. Hillard
• Florida - 449 So.2d 903 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1984), 83-821, State v. Rider
• Georgia - 336 S.E.2d 221 (Ga. 1985), 42545, Warren v. State
• Kentucky - 27 S.W. 815 (Ky.App. 1894), Commonwealth v. Wright
• Massachusetts - 383 Mass. 123 (1981), Commonwealth v. Chretien
• New Jersey - 426 A.2d 38 (N.J. 1981), State v. Smith
• New York - 100 A.D.2d 741, People v. Liberta
• Wyoming - 742 P.2d 775 (Wyo. 1987), 87-32, Shunn v. State
• Convention on the Rights of the Child