Republic of Ecuador v Occidental Exploration & Production Company [QBD (Comm)]

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Republic of Ecuador v Occidental Exploration and Production Company
• Loewen v United States of America
• Azov Shipping Company v Baltic Shipping Company

REFERS TO

• Gas Natural SDG SA v Argentine Republic
• R v DPP, ex parte Kebeline
• Azov Shipping Company v Baltic Shipping Company [QBD (Comm)]

[See more]

• Camuzzi International SA v Argentine Republic
• R (Abassi and another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Launder
• Jones v Ministry of the Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and another (Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and another intervening); Mitchell v Al-Dali;
• Oppenheimer v Cattermole

CITES

• R v DPP ex parte Kebeline
• Dardana Ltd v Yukos Oil Company
• Maclaine Watson & Company Ltd v International Tin Council

[See more]

• LG Caltex Gas Company Ltd and another v China National Petroleum Corporation and another
• Dallal v Bank Mellat
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Adan
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind
• Oppenheimer v Cattermole
• Armar Shipping Company Ltd v Caisse Algérienne d'Assurance et de Réassurance
• Philippson v Imperial Airways Ltd
• R (Abassi and another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another
• Buttes Gas and Oil Company v Hammer; Buttes Gas and Oil Company v Hammer (No. 3)
• R v Lyons ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Saunders (No 3)
• Re McKerr

CONSIDERS

• Arbitration Act 1996
• Arbitration Act 1996 - Articles : S-67
• Arbitration Act 1996 - Articles : S-68

[See more]

• Arbitration Act 1996
• Arbitration Act 1996 - Articles : S-103
• Arbitration Act 1996 - Articles : S-48

CITED in

• Czech Republic v European Media Ventures SA [QBD (Comm)]

REFERRED in

• Cargill v Mexico [NAFTA Arbitration Tribunal]
• Law by Design Ltd v Saira Ali
• City of London v Sancheti

[See more]

• ETI Euro Telecom International NV v Republic of Bolivia and Another
• Czech Republic v European Media Ventures SA

CONSIDERED in

• AY Bank Ltd v Bosnia and Herzegovina and Others
• The Queen (on the application of Louis Olivier Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2006] 2 CLC 1
• [2005] 2 Lloyd's Rep 240

AFFIRMED in

• Republic of Ecuador v Occidental Exploration and Production Company

FOLLOWED in

• The Republic of Serbia v Imagesat International NV

This document cites

---

• R v DPP, ex parte Kebeline
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind
• R v Lyons ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Saunders (No 3)
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Adan
• R v DPP ex parte Kebeline



See all quotations

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Launder
• Maclaine Watson & Company Ltd v International Tin Council
• Oppenheimer v Cattermole
• Dardana Ltd v Yukos Oil Company
• R (Abassi and another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another
• LG Caltex Gas Company Ltd and another v China National Petroleum Corporation and another
• R (Abassi and another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another
• Armar Shipping Company Ltd v Caisse Algérienne d'Assurance et de Réassurance
• Buttes Gas and Oil Company v Hammer; Buttes Gas and Oil Company v Hammer (No. 3)
• Republic of Ecuador v Occidental Exploration and Production Company
• Oppenheimer v Cattermole
• Jones v Ministry of the Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and another (Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and another intervening); Mitchell v Al-Dali;
• Dallal v Bank Mellat
• Azov Shipping Company v Baltic Shipping Company [QBD (Comm)]
• Philippson v Imperial Airways Ltd
• Azov Shipping Company v Baltic Shipping Company
• Camuzzi International SA v Argentine Republic
• Gas Natural SDG SA v Argentine Republic
• Re McKerr
• Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
• Federal Cases - Loewen v United States of America