Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.

This document cites

• Council of the European Union v European Commission.
• Comisión Europea contra Consejo de la Unión Europea.
• Anklagemyndigheden contra Peter Michael Poulsen y Diva Navigation Corp..
• Comune di Milano v Council of the European Union.
• Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union (Text with EEA relevance)



See all quotations

• Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast)Text with EEA relevance.
• Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Office (Text with EEA relevance)
• Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive)
• Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Agency for Support for BEREC (BEREC Office), amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009Text with EEA relevance.
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2016/C 202/01
• Tratado de la Unión Europea
• Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union (recast) (Text with EEA relevance)
• Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 6 octobre 2020.#Bank Refah Kargaran contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune (PESC) – Article 29 TUE – Article 215 TFUE – Mesures restrictives prises à l’encontre de la République islamique d’Iran – Préjudice prétendument subi par la requérante à la suite de l’inscription et du maintien de son nom sur la liste des personnes et des entités auxquelles s’applique le gel de fonds et de ressources économiques – Recours en indemnité – Compétence de la Cour pour statuer sur la demande en réparation du préjudice prétendument subi en raison de mesures restrictives prévues par des décisions relevant de la PESC – Violation suffisamment caractérisée d’une règle de droit ayant pour objet de conférer des droits aux particuliers – Insuffisance de motivation d’actes instituant des mesures restrictives.#Affaire C-134/19 P.
• Johannes Dietrich v Hessischer Rundfunk.
• European Commission v Council of the European Union.
• Italian Republic v Council of the European Union.