Constitutional implications of regional C(O.sub.2) cap-and-trade programs: the northeast regional greenhouse gas initiative as a case in point.
›
Linked as:Extract
Constitutional implications of regional C(O.sub.2) cap-and-trade programs: the northeast regional greenhouse gas initiative as a case in point.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 338 F.3d 82 (2nd Cir. 2003), 02-7519, Clean Air Markets Group v. Pataki
- Federal Cases - 529 F.Supp.2d 1151 (E.D.Cal. 2007), CV F 04-6663, Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep, Inc. v. Goldstene
- Federal Cases - 472 U.S. 159 (1985), 84-363, Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
- Federal Cases - 483 U.S. 232 (1987), 85-1963, Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State
- Federal Cases - 511 U.S. 93 (1994), 93-70, Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environment Qaulity of Ore
