Reference Re Goods and Services Tax, (1991) 117 A.R. 321 (CA)

This document cites

• Residential Tenancies Act of Ontario, Re, (1981) 37 N.R. 158 (SCC)
• Ellett Estate v. Attorney General of British Columbia and Attorneys General of Canada, Quebec, Nova Scotia and Manitoba, (1980) 32 N.R. 326 (SCC)
• City National Leasing Ltd. v. General Motors of Canada Ltd., (1989) 93 N.R. 326 (SCC)
• Manitoba Fisheries Ltd. v. Canada, (1978) 23 N.R. 159 (SCC)
• Agricultural Products Marketing Act, R.S.C. 1970, Farm Products Marketing Agencies Act, S.C. 1972, Farm Products Marketing Act, R.S.O. 1970, Re, (1978) 19 N.R. 361 (SCC)



See all quotations

• Nowegijick v. Minister of National Revenue et al., (1983) 46 N.R. 41 (SCC)
• Blaikie v. Quebec (Attorney General) et al., (1979) 30 N.R. 225 (SCC)
• Peel (Regional Municipality) v. MacKenzie and Attorney General of Canada, (1982) 42 N.R. 572 (SCC)
• Skapinker v. Law Society of Upper Canada, (1984) 53 N.R. 169 (SCC)
• Alberta Natural Gas Tax Reference, (1982) 37 A.R. 541 (SCC)
• Alberta Natural Gas Tax Reference, (1982) 42 N.R. 361 (SCC)
• William Kurt Wallersteiner (Plaintiff Appellant) M. J. G Moir (Defendant Respondent) M. J. G Moir (Plaintiff on counterclaim) William Kurt Wallersteiner Hartley Baird Ltd and Another (Defendants on counterclaim)
• Williams v Lister & Company
• Attorney General for Ontario v Attorney General for Canada
• Brophy v Attorney General of Manitoba
• British Coal Corporation v R
• Attorney General for Ontario v Hamilton Street Railway Company
• Thacker v Hardy
• Att'y-Gen'l of British Columbia v Att'y-Gen'l of Dom. of Canada
• Bennett & White (Calgary) Ltd v Municipal District of Sugar City No. 5
• Secretary of State v Bank of India, Ltd
• Lord's Day Alliance of Canada v Attorney General for Manitoba
• Re Section 24 of the B.N.A. Act
• The Rural Municipality of Vermillion Hills, No. 195, v Smith
• Giuseppe Frixione, - Appellant; Biagio Tagliaferro and Sons, - Respondents
• Frederick Bristow, - Appellant; William Whitmore and Others-Respondents
• Attorney General for Ontario and Others v Attorney General for Canada and Others and Attorney General for Quebec
• Attorney-general for the Province of Ontario and Others Appellants; and Attorney-general for the Dominion of Canada Respondent; and Attorney-general for the Province of British Columbia Intervener