Reading Borough Council v P (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Children Act 1989
• Children Act 1989

CONSIDERS

• AG
• Lloyds Bank v Institute of Cancer Research ; Re Dellow's Will Trusts
• Re A (Fact-Finding: Disputed Findings)

[See more]

• Andranick Joseph Petros and Quen Mok and Christine Pierce and Mark Peters and Rupert Risdon and Mark Kenny v Sadhana Chaudhari and Neelu Berry/
• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• A Local Authority v B (1st Respondent) C (2nd Respondent) a Child, D, through her Children's Guardian, (3rd Respondent)
• Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis (Artemision II., Christina.)
• A (No. 2) (Children: Findings of Fact)
• G and B (Children)
• B (A Child)
• Re W (A Child)
• Lancashire County Council v (by their Children's Guardian) (1st Respondents) M (2nd Respondent) F (3rd Respondent)

REFERS TO

• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• Lloyds Bank v Institute of Cancer Research ; Re Dellow's Will Trusts
• Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis (Artemision II., Christina.)

[See more]

• Andranick Joseph Petros and Quen Mok and Christine Pierce and Mark Peters and Rupert Risdon and Mark Kenny v Sadhana Chaudhari and Neelu Berry/
• G and B (Children)
• Re A (Fact-Finding: Disputed Findings)
• Lancashire County Council v (by their Children's Guardian) (1st Respondents) M (2nd Respondent) F (3rd Respondent)
• A Local Authority v B (1st Respondent) C (2nd Respondent) a Child, D, through her Children's Guardian, (3rd Respondent)
• Re W (A Child)
• B (A Child)
• A (No. 2) (Children: Findings of Fact)
• A Local Authority v M

FOLLOWS

• AG

This document cites

• Lancashire County Council v (by their Children's Guardian) (1st Respondents) M (2nd Respondent) F (3rd Respondent)
• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis (Artemision II., Christina.)
• AG
• Andranick Joseph Petros and Quen Mok and Christine Pierce and Mark Peters and Rupert Risdon and Mark Kenny v Sadhana Chaudhari and Neelu Berry/



See all quotations

• A London Borough v S and S (an adult by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor)
• A Local Authority v B (1st Respondent) C (2nd Respondent) a Child, D, through her Children's Guardian, (3rd Respondent)
• G and B (Children)
• Re A (Fact-Finding: Disputed Findings)
• Lloyds Bank v Institute of Cancer Research ; Re Dellow's Will Trusts
• Re W (A Child)
• Children Act 1989
• A (No. 2) (Children: Findings of Fact)
• B (A Child)