Re the interventions into the solicitors' practices known as (1) Ahmed & Company, (2) Biebuyck Solicitors, (3) Dixon & Company and (4) the practices of Mr Zoi; Re the Law Society Compensation Fund Rules 1995

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

Core Citations

CITES

Moody v Cox and Hatt
Re Berkeley Applegate (Investment Consultants) Ltd ; Harris v Conway and Others
Between William Devaynes and Louisa his Wife, and Thomas Monsell (an Infant), Plaintiffs and Wm. Noble, Sam. Pepys Cockerell, Fred. Booth, Mary Devaynes. Elizabeth Smith, Lestock Wilson, John Morris, and Joseph Down, Defendants. and between Sir Thomas Baring, Bart., and Sir Frank Standish, Bart. (on behalf of themselves, and all other the Creditors of the partnership of William Devaynes, John Dawes, William Noble, Richard Henry Croft, and Richard Barwick, who shall come in and contribute, Company), Plaintiffs and the said william Noble, Samuel Pepys Cockerell. Frederick Booth, Lestock Wilson, John Morris, Joseph Dorien, Wm. Devaynes, and Louisa his Wife, Mary Devaynes, Elizabeth Smith, and Thomas Monsell, Defendants

[See more]

REPORTED OPINION OF in

8 ITELR 779

REFERRED in

Andrew Roy Williams v The Law Society of England and Wales (solicitors Regulation Authority)

CITED in

Global Trader Europe Ltd v Milner and Another
Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (No 2)

CONSIDERED in

Lehman Brothers; CRC Credit Fund Ltd and Others v GLG Investments Plc (Sub-Fund: European Equity Fund) and Others

This document cites

Holder v Law Society
Woolwich Equitable Building Society v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns
Pine v Law Society
Trustees of the Dennis Rye Pension Fund and Another v Sheffield City Council

See all quotations