Re N (Financial Provision: Dependency)
Linked as:
Extract
Re N (Financial Provision: Dependency)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Re S (a Child: Unmarried parents: Financial provision)
- Quistclose Investments Ltd v Rolls Razor Ltd ((in Liquidation))
- Re T (Contact: Alienation: Permission to Appeal)
REFERS TO
- T v S (Financial Provision for Children)
- Masefield v Alexander (Lump Sum: Extension of Time)
- N (A Child)
[See more]
APPLIES
- Quistclose Investments Ltd v Rolls Razor Ltd ((in Liquidation))
- Egan v Motor Services (Bath) Ltd (Note)
CITES
CONSIDERS
- Re P (Child: Financial provision)
- A v A (A Minor: Financial Provision)
- J v C (Child: Financial Provision)
[See more]
DISTINGUISHES
CITED in
REFERRED in
- Re N (Payments for benefit of child: costs)
- A v G & N
- UD v DN (Schedule 1, Children Act 1989; Capital Provision)
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CONSIDERED in