Re Majory, A Debtor. ex parte the Debtor v F. A. Dumont Ltd

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• Shaw, Re, ex parts Gill
• Re Atkinson. Wilson v Atkinson
• King v Henderson

APPLIES

• Re a Judgment Summons (No. 25 of 1952)ex parte Henlys Ltd
• Re Bebro

DISTINGUISHES

• Re A Debtor

CONSIDERS

• Bankruptcy Act 1914 - Articles : S-5

CONSIDERED in

• Bank of Cyprus (London) Ltd v Marcus David Jones
• Melbourne City Investments Pty Ltd(Applicant) v Myer Holdings Ltd
• Iain Paul Barker v Paul Baxendale-Walker

[See more]

• Re Malcolm Robert Ross (a Bankrupt)(no. 2) and Another v Stonewood Securities Ltd and Another
• David Stevens (Plaintiff/Applicant) v Alliance and Leicester Building Society and Another
• Ariff v Fong
• Gordon Apsion (Applicant/Claimant) v Rupert Butler (Respondent/Defendant)
• Van Der Lee and Others v State of New South Wales and Others
• Hays Plc v Jonathan Hartley
• Newheadspace Pty Ltd (in Liquidation)
• Wilcox v Wilcox (No 2)
• Yang v Stephen Paul Firth trading as Firths The Compensation Lawyers
• Christopher George Murtough v Betham and Another
• Land Securities Plc & Others v Fladgate Fielder ( A Firm)
• Hm Attorney-general v Ian Richard Flack
• HM Attorney-General v Ian Richard Flack
• Coulibaly (A Minor) and Others v Minister for Justice
• Ncube v Min for Justice
• TS Recoveries v Sea-Slip Marinas
• Gladstone Industrial Pty Ltd and Dimitris Amargianitakis v Gladstone Mortgagee No 1 Pty Ltd
• President Donald J. Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd
• Walker and Scutter and Others v Forbes and Others
• Francisc Catalin Deliu v The Lawyers Complaints Service of the New Zealand Law Society
• Waterco (Nz) Ltd v David Alan Simpson Hc Ak
• Shanghai Neuhof Trade Company Ltd v Zespri International Ltd
• Speed Seal Products Ltd v Paddington
• (1) Mark Alan Holyoake v (1) Nicholas Anthony Christopher Candy
• Werner Fuhrken Batista v Dietrich Fuhrken Batista
• Werner Fuhrken Batista v Dietrich Fuhrken Batista
• Leona Flynn v National Asset Loan Management Ltd and Others
• Carson v Legal Services Commissioner and Another
• Dunnes Stores v Bord Pleanála and Others
• Rock v Henderson
• Michael Wilson and Partners Ltd v Robert Colin Nicholls and Others
• Continental Finance Trading Company v Gollmer et Al
• Quinn v an Bord Pleanála
• LDX International Group LLP v Misra Ventures Ltd

CITED in

• Palm Springs Ltd v Darling
• Second Life Decor Pty Ltd v Comptroller-General of Customs
• Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Pattison

[See more]

• Pitman Training Ltd v Nominet UK
• Walton v Gardiner, Herron and Gill
• Walton v Gardiner
• Penwith District Council v VP Developments Ltd
• Williams and Others v Spautz
• JSC Bta Bank v Mukhtar Ablyazov and Others
• Susan May King v Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund
• Wilfred Nembhard v Superlube Ltd

REFERRED in

• Rozenbes v Kronhill
• Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd v Ngan Ching Wen
• Tetuan Bee Ling & Company v Vijendran Ponniah

[See more]

• Malaysia Building Society Bhd v Tan Sri General Ungku Nazaruddin Ungku Mohamed
• Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim v Norina Zainol Abidin and Others
• Multimedia Development Corporation Sdn Bhd v Pembinaan Purcon Sdn Bhd
• Conweld Engineering Sdn Bhd and Others v Goh Swee Boh @ Goh Cheng Kin and Another
• Aabar Block S.A.R.L and Another (Petitioners) v Glenn Maud
• President Donald J. Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd
• Harlow Higinbotham (formerly BWK) v Wipaporn Teekhungam
• Land Securities Plc v Fladgate Fielder (A Firm)
• Bula Holdings and Others v Roche and Others
• Aabar Block S.A.R.L. v Glenn Maud
• Re Maud; Maud v Aabar Block S.a.r.l and another
• Beades v Ireland
• Goldsmith v Sperrings Ltd

APPLIED in

• Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Casella

DISTINGUISHED in

• Puncak Niaga Holdings Berhad v Kris Heavy Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd

FOLLOWED in

• Malayan Banking Bhd. v Datuk Lim Kheng Khim (1)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1955] 2 All ER 65
• [1955] 2 WLR 1035
• [1955] CH 600

This document cites

---

• Re a Judgment Summons (No. 25 of 1952)ex parte Henlys Ltd
• Re Bebro
• Shaw, Re, ex parts Gill
• King v Henderson
• Re A Debtor



See all quotations

• Re Atkinson. Wilson v Atkinson