Re M and R (Child Abuse: Evidence)
Linked as:
Extract
Re M and R (Child Abuse: Evidence)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
DISAPPROVES
- Re S and B (Minors) (Child Abuse: Evidence)
- Re FS (Child Abuse: Evidence)
- Re N (Child Abuse: Evidence)
CONSIDERS
- Re N (Residence: Hopeless Appeals)
- G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal)
- R v Silcott ; R v Braithwaite ; R v Raghip
[See more]
CONSIDERS
- Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-1
- Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-31
- Civil Evidence Act 1972 - Articles : S-3
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- C B v T County Council (1st Respondent) H S (2nd Respondent) M and J. B (by Their Guardian J M) (3rd Respondent)
- H (A Minor)
- Re S (A Child) (Expert Evidence)
[See more]
CITED in
- S (A Child)
- North Yorkshire County Council v Neil Swift Suzanne Swift
- Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd (trading as Washington DC)
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
REFERRED in
- Wigan Council v M, Mr C, Mr P, GM, G, B and CC (by their Children's Guardian) (1st–9th Respondents)
- Puncak Alam Housing Sdn Bhd v Menta Construction Sdn Bhd
- Re B (Minors) (Issue Estoppel)
[See more]
APPROVED in
APPLIED in
- H (Parents With Learning Difficulties: Risk of Harm)
- Adrian John Bailey v Secretary of State for Justice
- B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)
REPORTED OPINION OF in