Re G (Children)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Re T and E (Proceedings: Conflicting Interests)
• Re McGrath (Infants)
• Re E (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment)

[See more]

• Re O (Contact: Imposition of Conditions)
• S (Children)
• Campbell and Fell v United Kingdom
• C v C (A Minor) (Custody: Appeal)
• Re J (Specific Issue Orders: Child's Religious Upbringing and Circumcision)
• Re J (Specific Issue Orders: Muslim Upbringing and Circumcision)
• Re J (A Minor)
• (1) The Trade Mark Licensing Company Ltd (Claimants and Part 20 Defendants Respondents) (2) Lonsdale Sports Ltd v Leofelis Sa (Defendant and Part 20 Claimant Appellant) (1) Punch GmbH and Others (Third Parties Respondents)
• Re S (Specific Issue Order: Religion: Circumcision)
• Re S (Sterilisation: Patient's Best Interests)
• Re B. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation)
• Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority
• Birmingham City Council v H. (A Minor)
• Re S: Newcastle City Council v Z

REFERS TO

• C v C (Custody of Child)
• Re L (Care: Threshold Criteria)
• Re O (A Minor) (Contact: Indirect Contact)

[See more]

• Re J (A Minor) (Prohibited Steps Order: Circumcision), Re sub nom J (A Child), Re J (Child's Religious Upbringing and Circumcision)
• Birmingham City Council v H (No 2)
• Re S (Minors) (Proceedings: Conflicting interests)

CITES

• Re Agar-Ellis. Agar-Ellis v Lascelles
• Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation)
• Re B and G (Minors) (Custody)

[See more]

• Hutcheson (formerly Known as "wer") v Popdog Ltd (formerly known as "rew") News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Sl (Adult Patient) (Sterilisation), Re sub nom Sl (Adult Patient) (Medical Treatment), Re; Sl v Sl; S (Sterilisation: Patient's Best Interests)
• Oakley v Birmingham City Council
• Re W (A Minor) (Medical Treatment: Court's Jurisdiction)
• Ward v Laverty and Another

CONSIDERS

• Re T (Minors) (Custody: Religious Upbringing)
• Westminster City Council v C and Others
• Newcastle City Council v (1) Z (2) M

[See more]

• J v C
• R (A Minor)
• Piglowski v Piglowski
• Re E (A Minor)
• Children Act 1989
• Children Act 1989
• Guardianship of Infants Act 1925 - Articles : S-1
• Guardianship of Infants Act 1886
• Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919
• Guardianship of Minors Act 1971 - Articles : S-1
• Adoption Act 1976
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-1

CONSIDERED in

• L (Children)
• L (Children)
• OY v AY

[See more]

• K (Children)
• W (A Child: Leave to Oppose Adoption)
• N (A Child) (Instruction of Expert)
• M (A Child: Leave to Oppose Adoption)
• Re N (A Child: Section 37: Interim Care Order)
• M (Children)
• Bibi Marium Shanavazi
• D (A Child)

REFERRED in

• A Local Authority v A and Another
• Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v GTI (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor)
• Mr and Mrs A v A Local Authority and Others

[See more]

• W (A Child: Leave to Oppose Adoption)
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Skripal
• Salford City Council v W
• Bibi Marium Shanavazi
• Re S (Parental Alienation: Cult)
• A NHS Trust v X
• Tini Owens v Hugh John Owens

CITED in

• F v M (First Respondent) A and B (through their Guardian) (2nd and 3rd Respondents)
• S (Children)
• Prospective Adopters v SA (father) (1st Respondent) TB (mother) (by the Official solicitor) (2nd Respondent) A London Borough (3rd Respondent) SSM (child) (by his children's guardian) (4th Respondent)

[See more]

• M (A Child: Leave to Oppose Adoption)
• Prospective Adopters v Brighton & Hove City Council (1st Respondent) Father (2nd Respondent) Mother (3rd Respondent) W (A Child) (by her children's guardian) (4th Respondent)
• Paula Parfitt v Guy's and St Thomas' Children's NHS Foundation Trust
• Leeds City Council v M and Others
• Re B-S (Children)

FOLLOWED in

• H & B (1st & 2nd Applicants) v S (1st Respondent) M (A Child) (by her Children' Guardian) (2nd Respondent)
• Re E (A Child) (Medical Treatment)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2012] WLR D 265
• [2013] 1 FLR 677
• [2012] 3 Fam CR 524

This document cites

• Westminster City Council v C and Others
• Re T (Minors) (Custody: Religious Upbringing)
• Oakley v Birmingham City Council
• R (A Minor)
• Piglowski v Piglowski



See all quotations

• Hutcheson (formerly Known as "wer") v Popdog Ltd (formerly known as "rew") News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation)
• C v C (A Minor) (Custody: Appeal)
• Ward v Laverty and Another
• Re J (Specific Issue Orders: Child's Religious Upbringing and Circumcision)
• Re S (Sterilisation: Patient's Best Interests)
• S (Children)
• Re J (A Minor)
• Birmingham City Council v H. (A Minor)
• Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority
• Re B. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation)
• (1) The Trade Mark Licensing Company Ltd (Claimants and Part 20 Defendants Respondents) (2) Lonsdale Sports Ltd v Leofelis Sa (Defendant and Part 20 Claimant Appellant) (1) Punch GmbH and Others (Third Parties Respondents)
• Newcastle City Council v (1) Z (2) M
• J v C
• Re E (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment)
• Re B and G (Minors) (Custody)
• Birmingham City Council v H (No 2)
• Re McGrath (Infants)
• Re T and E (Proceedings: Conflicting Interests)
• Re S: Newcastle City Council v Z
• Re S (Minors) (Proceedings: Conflicting interests)
• Re S (Specific Issue Order: Religion: Circumcision)
• C v C (Custody of Child)
• Re L (Care: Threshold Criteria)
• Re J (A Minor) (Prohibited Steps Order: Circumcision), Re sub nom J (A Child), Re J (Child's Religious Upbringing and Circumcision)
• Sl (Adult Patient) (Sterilisation), Re sub nom Sl (Adult Patient) (Medical Treatment), Re; Sl v Sl; S (Sterilisation: Patient's Best Interests)
• Re W (A Minor) (Medical Treatment: Court's Jurisdiction)
• Re O (Contact: Imposition of Conditions)
• Re J (Specific Issue Orders: Muslim Upbringing and Circumcision)
• Re O (A Minor) (Contact: Indirect Contact)