Re DB's Application for Judicial Review
Linked as:
Extract
Re DB's Application for Judicial Review
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REFERS TO
- R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School
- Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Abu-Qulbain v Same; Kashmiri v Same
- E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
[See more]
RESUELVE RECURSO
CONSIDERS
- Public Processions (Northern Ireland) Act 1998
- Human Rights Act 1998
- Police (Northern Ireland) Act 2000 - Articles : S-32
REVERSES
APPLIES
REFERRED in
- Anderson v North West Strategic Health Authority
- McQuillan, Re Application for Judicial Review
- Shafiq Malik v Henley Homes Plc
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council R (Adamson) v R (Adamson)
- Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council R (Adamson) v R (Adamson)
- Li Quan v Stuart Bray (1st Respondent) Maitland (Mauritius) Ltd (2nd Respondent) Chinese Tigers South African Trust (3rd Respondent) Save China's Tigers (4th Respondent) Ralph Edmond Bray (5th Respondent) Conservation Finance Ltd (6th Respondent) The Attorney General (7th Respondent)
[See more]
CITED in
- Harvey and another v Brette and Others
- The King on the application of H.R.H. The Prince Henry Charles Albert David, Duke of Sussex v secretary of State for the Home Department
- Ted Baker Plc and Another v Axa Insurance UK Plc and Others
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
APPLIED in
This document cites
- R v Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith
- R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v ZH (a protected party, by Gh, his litigation friend) Liberty (First Intervener) Equality and Human Rights Commission (Second Intervener)
- Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
- McGraddie v McGraddie