Re C T (an Infant) ; Re J T (an Infant)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Guardianship of Infants Act 1925
• Guardianship of Infants Act 1886

DISTINGUISHES

• Re A

APPLIES

• Galloway v Galloway
• Re M, an Infant

FOLLOWS

• Re E (an Infant)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1956] 3 All ER 500
• [1956] 3 WLR 826
• [1957] CH 48

CONSIDERED in

• Mohammed v Mohammed
• Stanley Clarke v Madge Carey
• Re Lewis

[See more]

• White v Springle
• White v Springle
• Re W. (an Infant)
• Re C, an Infant

CITED in

• Re C J an Infant
• Katyuska Del Carmen Tarra v Elton Leonard
• Finlayson v Matthews

DISTINGUISHED in

• O; T

FOLLOWED in

• Sinnakaruppi Periakaruppan v Bathumalai Krishnan
• Balasingam & Paravathy, Infants, Re; Kannamah v Palani

REFERRED in

• Sinnakaruppi Periakaruppan v Bathumalai Krishnan
• Koh Chye Guan; Low Pek Nai
• Low Pak Houng v Tan Kok Keong

[See more]

• Re Adoption Application 41/61

APPLIED in

• Watson-Morgan v Grant