Re AR (A Child: Relocation)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-1
• Payne v Payne

CONSIDERED in

• E (Children)
• F v B
• (1) The Trade Mark Licensing Company Ltd (Claimants and Part 20 Defendants Respondents) (2) Lonsdale Sports Ltd v Leofelis Sa (Defendant and Part 20 Claimant Appellant) (1) Punch GmbH and Others (Third Parties Respondents)

[See more]

• T.F. Respondent/ Mother v S.D. Applicant/Father
• Naomi Lyn Baraud Petitioner/Appellant v Stefan Christophe Dion Baraud Respondent
• Grace (a pseudonym) (Relocation application)
• B v A
• A (The Mother) v B (The Father)
• N (the Father) v M (the Mother)
• B Petitioner v B Respondent
• Re F (A Child) (Permission to Relocate)
• MK v CK
• NJ v OV

CITED in

• RE TC and JC (Children: Relocation)
• M v M
• BNS v BNT

[See more]

• B vB
• Re W (Children)

REFERRED in

• J v S (Leave to Remove)
• Fz v Sz (Ancillary Relief: Conduct)

DISTINGUISHED in

• C v D

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2010] 2 FLR 1577
• 2010 WL 2595048
• [2010] 3 Fam CR 131

APPLIED in

• GT v RJ
• B v B

FOLLOWED in

• B v B

This document cites

• Poel v Poel
• Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council
• D (Children)
• D v D
• H (A Child)



See all quotations

• Payne v Payne
• Re S C (A Child)
• G (Children)
• Re C (Abduction: Residence and Contact)
• Children Act 1989
• Human Rights Act 1998