Rawls v Irish Tyre and Rubber Services Ltd

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Non-Drip Measure Company Ltd v Stangers Ltd
• British Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company Ltd v Braulik
• Hicton's Patent Syndicate v Patents & Machine Improvements Company Ltd

CONSIDERS

• Harwood and Another, Executors of C H Wild, against The Great Northern Railway Company
• Lane Fox v Kensington and Knightsbridge Electric Lighting Company

CITES

• Penn v Bibby

APPLIES

• Pirrie v York-Street Flax Spinning Company

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1960] IR 11 (Digest)
• [1960] IR 11

CONSIDERED in

• Farvberke Hoechst v Intercontinental Pharmaceuticals (Eire) Ltd
• Wavin Pipes v Hepworth Ireland and Company Ltd

This document cites

• British Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company Ltd v Braulik
• Crane v Price and Others
• British United Shoe Machinery Company Ltd v Fussell & Sons Ltd
• Hicton's Patent Syndicate v Patents & Machine Improvements Company Ltd
• Plimpton v Malcolmson



See all quotations

• Parkes, Samuel, & Company v Cocker Bros Ltd
• Pope Appliance Corporation v Spanish River Pulp & Paper Mills, Ltd Pope Appliance Corporation v Abitibi Power & Paper Company Ltd
• Pirrie v York-Street Flax Spinning Company
• Penn v Bibby
• National Colour Kinematograph Company, Ltd v Bioschemes, Ltd
• British United Shoe Machinery Company Ltd v A. Fussell & Sons Ltd
• British Thomson - Houston Company Ltd v Corona Lamp Works Ltd
• Re Avery's Patent
• Hamilton E. Harwood and another Executor of C. Heard Wild, Deceased, -Appellants; the Directors, etc. of the Great Northern Railway Company, -Respondents
• Lane Fox v Kensington and Knightsbridge Electric Lighting Company
• British Acoustic Films Ltd v Nettlefold Productions
• Non-Drip Measure Company Ltd v Stangers Ltd
• Edison and Swan Electric Light Company v Holland
• Harwood and Another, Executors of C H Wild, against The Great Northern Railway Company
• Electric & Musical Industries v Lissen Ltd
• Siddell v Vickers
• Industrial and Commercial Property (Protection) Act, 1927.