Rawlance v Croydon Corporation

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Housing Act 1936 - Articles : S-9
• Housing Act 1936

DISTINGUISHES

• Poplar Assessment Committee v Roberts

REFERS TO

• Port of London Authority v Orsett Union Assessment Committee

[See more]

• London County Council v Churchwardens and Overseers of Parish of Erith. Churchwardens and Overseers of Parish of West Ham v London County Council. Assessment Committee of St. George's Union v London County Council
• Truman, Hanbury, Buxton & Company v Kerslake
• Wright v Ingle
• Royal Crown Derby Porcelain Company Ltd v Raymond Russell
• Gundry (A. P.) v D. Dunham. (Surveyor of Taxes)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 2 TLR 460
• [1952] 2 All ER 535
• [1952] 2 QB 803

APPLIED in

• Newman v Dorrington Developments Ltd
• Gldlow-Jackson v Middlegate Properties Ltd

REFERRED in

• R v Minister of Housing and Local Government. ex parte Corporation of London
• Compton Group Ltd v Estates Gazette Ltd
• Oei v Foster

[See more]

• Manson v Duke of Westminster

CONSIDERED in

• Ashworth Frazer Ltd v Gloucester City Council
• London Corporation v Cusack-Smith

This document cites

• Royal Crown Derby Porcelain Company Ltd v Raymond Russell
• Gundry (A. P.) v D. Dunham. (Surveyor of Taxes)
• Wright v Ingle
• Port of London Authority v Orsett Union Assessment Committee
• Truman, Hanbury, Buxton & Company v Kerslake



See all quotations

• Poplar Assessment Committee v Roberts
• London County Council v Churchwardens and Overseers of Parish of Erith. Churchwardens and Overseers of Parish of West Ham v London County Council. Assessment Committee of St. George's Union v London County Council