Ramalingam Ravinthran v Attorney-General
Linked as:
Extract
Ramalingam Ravinthran v Attorney-General
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
DISTINGUISHES
REFERS TO
- Lim Choon Chye v Public Prosecutor
- Abdullah bin A Rahman v Public Prosecutor
- Vignes s/o Mourthi v Public Prosecutor (No 3)
[See more]
CONSIDERS
CITES
- Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v MCST Plan No 301
- Chng Suan Tze v Minister of Home Affairs and Others and other appeals
- Lee Keng Guan and Others v Public Prosecutor
[See more]
APPLIES
FOLLOWS
- Thiruselvam s/o Nagaratnam v Public Prosecutor
- Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General
- Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guat Neo Phyllis
APPROVES
REPORTED OPINION OF in
REFERRED in
- PP lwn Datuk Hj Wasli Mohd Said
- Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim v Pendakwa Raya
- Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor
[See more]
CITED in
- Lee Siew Boon Winston v PP
- Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali v AG
- Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali v Attorney-General
[See more]
APPLIED in
DISTINGUISHED in
This document cites
- R v DPP, ex parte Manning and another
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
- Howe Yoon Chong v Chief Assessor and Another
- Ong Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor
