Raccio v. Raccio

This document cites

• Connecticut - Silver v. Silver
• Connecticut - Rubin v. Rubin
• Minnesota - Van de Loo v. Van de Loo
• Maryland - Unkle v. Unkle
• Connecticut - Thompson v. Thompson



See all quotations

• Arizona - Jurek v. Jurek
• Pennsylvania - Hurley v. Hurley
• Connecticut - Clayman v. Prochaska, 2473
• North Carolina - Johnson v. Johnson, 8426DC781
• Michigan - Heilman v. Heilman, Docket No. 78-5016
• North Carolina - Little v. Little, 8420DC95
• Connecticut - Lynch v. Skelly
• North Dakota - Fries v. Fries, 9682
• Kentucky - Weakley v. Weakley
• Idaho - Cook v. Cook
• Missouri - Nixon v. Nixon, s. 36487 and 36488
• Indiana - McNevin v. McNevin
• Connecticut - Commonwealth Fuel Co. v. McNeil
• US - Reference Stubs - Rights or contingent rights in and to vested or unvested benefits or accumulated contributions as part of marital estate subject to award by court; amendment of court order to satisfy requirements of eligible domestic relations order
• US - Reference Stubs - Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-82 (Formerly Sec. 46-52). Alimony
• US - Reference Stubs - Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-81 (Formerly Sec. 46-51). Assignment of Property and Transfer of Title