R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and Another; R (Quinton) v Same

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms

CONSIDERS

• Human Rights Act 1998
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 - Articles : S-66
• Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001

[See more]

• Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions) Act 1996
• Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 - Articles : S-13A
• Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989
• Terrorism Act 2000 - Articles : S-45
• Terrorism Act 2000
• Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 - Articles : S-1
• Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 - Articles : S-60
• Race Relations Act 1976
• Earl of Aylesford Estate (Amendment) Act 1883
• Race Relations Act 1976 - Articles : S-42
• Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 - Articles : S-60AA
• Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 - Articles : S-23
• Firearms Act 1968 - Articles : S-47
• Terrorism Act 2000 - Articles : S-44

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Fisher and Others v English Nature

CITES

• A, X and Y and Others and Secretary of State for the Home Department
• European Roma Rights v Immigration Officer
• Ireland v United Kingdom

[See more]

• R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and Another; R (Quinton) v Same
• Malone v United Kingdom (A/82)
• R v Governor of Brockhill Prison, ex parte Evans (No. 2)
• R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and Another; R (Quinton) v Same
• European Roma Rights v Immigration Officer
• B.P. EXPLORATION OPERATING Company Ltd Pursuers (Appellants) against CHEVRON TRANSPORT (SCOTLAND) Defenders (Respondents)

CONSIDERED in

• R (Catt) v ACPO
• Yemshaw v Hounslow London Borough Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another intervening)
• R (S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• R Beaurish Tigere v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation & Skills Student Loans Company Ltd (Interested Party)
• Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio
• Beghal v DPP
• R (Roberts) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and another (Liberty intervening)
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 2)
• R Mohammed Gul v Secretary of State for Justice and Another
• R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v JJ and Others
• Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers
• Roberts v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and Others
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v E
• JE v DE (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor), Surrey County Council and EW [FD]
• R (S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Carla Batson-Orr v Corporal Ramsey
• Jesse Ryan Mark Rooplal v Comptroller of Customs and Excise
• The Financial Conduct Authority v Bluecrest Capital Management (UK) LLP
• The Queen (on the application of HM) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Roberts) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and another (Liberty intervening)
• Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• David Thomas James Howarth v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• A v HM Treasury (Nos 1 &2)
• Beghal v DPP
• R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence
• Brad Lee Lum v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Ravi Balgobin Maharaj v The Comptroller of Customs and Excise
• The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago v Vijay Maharaj
• Gary Griffith v Nigel Stoddard
• Attorney General v Anthony Henry
• Isaiah Prince v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Kenan Lopez v Cpl. Esmin Flores
• Dominic Suraj; Satyanand Maharaj v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Vijay Maharaj v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago

CITED in

• News Group Newspapers Ltd and Others v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
• W City Council v Mrs L (by her Litigation Friend PC)
• R (on the application of Wood) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner

[See more]

• R (on the application of Richards) v Teesside Magistrates Court
• R LD and Others v Secretary of State for Justice
• R (on the application of XX) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others
• Nancy Dell'Olio v Associated Newspapers Ltd
• Fox (Bernard) and McNulty's (Christine) Application and Canning's (Marvin) Application
• The Queen (on the application of C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions The Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervener)
• (first) The Christian Institute, (second) Family Education Trust, (third) The Young Me Sufferers ("tymes"), (fourth) Care (christian Action Research And Education), (fifth) And (sixth) James And Rhianwen Mcintosh And (seventh) Deborah Thomas Against The Scottish Ministers
• Petition Of Gordon Ross (ap) For Judicial Review
• Bishop v HMRC
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v MB [House of Lords
• Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
• R (E) v JFS Governing Body
• R (on the application of T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester

REFERRED in

• The Queen (on the application of Paul Richards) v Teesside Magistrates Court and Another
• In Gallagher and Others for Judicial Review
• R P v The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another

[See more]

• The Queen (on the application of John Oldroyd Catt) (Claimant/Appellant) v The Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland and Another Equality and Human Rights Commission and Others (Interveners)
• The Queen (on the application of Ibrahima Jollah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Privacy International v Investigatory Powers Tribunal
• Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed v Ministry of Defence (No 2)
• R (on the application of British American Tobacco Ltd and Others) v Secretary of State for Health; R (on the application of Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others) v Secretary of State for Health; R (on the application of JT International SA and another) v
• Graham Mouncher and Others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police
• Graham William Phillips v The Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs
• David Miranda v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (1st Defendant) The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis (2nd Defendant) (1) Liberty and Others (Interveners)
• Privacy International v Investigatory Powers Tribunal
• R (on the application of Catt) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; R (on the application of T) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
• The Queen (on application of Edward Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2006] 4 All ER 1041
• 08/03/2006 Daily Cases
• [2006] 2 CrAppR 36

[See more]

• [2006] 21 BHRC 202
• [2004] All ER D 543
• [2006] NR Uned 49
• [2006] 2 WLR 537
• [2006] 2 AC 307

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• R v Governor of Brockhill Prison, ex parte Evans (No. 2)
• B.P. EXPLORATION OPERATING Company Ltd Pursuers (Appellants) against CHEVRON TRANSPORT (SCOTLAND) Defenders (Respondents)
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
• European Roma Rights v Immigration Officer



See all quotations

• R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and Another; R (Quinton) v Same
• R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and Another; R (Quinton) v Same
• Firearms Act 1968
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
• Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
• Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989
• Terrorism Act 2000
• Earl of Aylesford Estate (Amendment) Act 1883
• Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001
• Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
• Race Relations Act 1976
• Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990
• Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions) Act 1996
• Explosive Substances Act 1883
• A, X and Y and Others and Secretary of State for the Home Department
• European Roma Rights v Immigration Officer
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Malone v United Kingdom (A/82)
• Ireland v United Kingdom