R v Taylor (Vincent)

Core Citations

---

APPLIES

• R v Scarrow

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• R v Sharp; R v Johnson
• R v Sharp

CONSIDERS

• Ministry of Housing and Local Government v Sharp

FOLLOWS

• R v Cross and Channon

CONSIDERS

• Forgery Act 1913 - Articles : S-1
• Criminal Law Act 1967 - Articles : S-4
• Theft Act 1968 - Articles : S-22

[See more]

• Criminal Justice Act 1925 - Articles : S-35
• Criminal Law Act 1967

ACLARA

• R v Button ; R v Swain

DISTINGUISHED in

• R v Hiscox

CONSIDERED in

• R v David Thomas Macer
• R v Plastow
• The Queen v Justin King

[See more]

• I v DPP. ; M v DPP. ; H v DPP
• R v Gnango

APPLIED in

• Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 1983)
• Attorney General v Capuano

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1973] 1 All ER 78
• [1973] AC 964
• [1973] 137 JP 91

[See more]

• [1972] 56 CrAppR 281
• [1972] 3 WLR 961

CITED in

• AG v Baglin
• AG v Capuano

FOLLOWED in

• Attorney General v Shewan, Peacock and Sullivan

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• R v Taylor (Vincent)

This document cites

---

• R v Button ; R v Swain
• R v Sharp; R v Johnson
• R v Scarrow
• Ministry of Housing and Local Government v Sharp
• R v Sharp



See all quotations

• R v Cross and Channon
• Theft Act 1968
• Forgery Act 1913
• Criminal Law Act 1967
• Criminal Justice Act 1925