R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Leech

Core Citations

---

RESUELVE RECURSO

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Leech

CONSIDERS

• Prison Act 1952 - Articles : S-47

REVERSES

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Leech

REFERS TO

• R v Board of Visitors of Dartmoor Prison, ex parte Smith
• Comfort Hotels Ltd v Wembley Stadium Ltd
• D— D—(Married Woman) (Plaintiff (Appellant) The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Defendants (Respondents)

[See more]

• DPP v Hutchinson
• Parry-Jones v Law Society
• Golder v United Kingdom (App No 4451/70)
• Leech v Secretary of State for Scotland

CITES

• Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd and Others (No. 2)

APPLIES

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Anderson
• Raymond v Honey

CONSIDERED in

• R AM v DPP (First Defendant) The Solicitors Regulation Authority (Second Defendant) The General Medical Council (Third Defendant)
• Amanda Duncan v Bedfordshire County Council and Another
• R v Governor of Frankland Prison, ex parte Russell and Another

[See more]

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Asifa Saleem
• R The Secretary of State for The Social Security and Others The Secretary of State for Social Security and Another
• The Queen (on the application of S) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department Geo Group Ltd and Others (Interested Parties)
• R The Secretary of State of the Home Department ex parte Michael O'Brien and Another The Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Liam O'Dhuibhir
• R v Secretary of State for Health and Kent Council Council, ex parte B
• Milton Wesley Parkins (Claimant/Appellant/Applicant) v Westminster City Council
• R DE HOGHTON v The governor of Long Lartin Prision The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Maff and Secretary of State for Wales and Another
• R Amarjit Singh v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Asifa Saleem (Applicant/Respondent) v Secretary of State for The Home Department (Respondent/Appellant)
• R Kevan Atul Kumar Thakrar v The Secretary of State for Justice
• R (Pearson and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others; Hirst v Attorney General
• R (M (A Child)) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• Sugumar Balakrishnan v Pengarah Imigresen Negeri Sabah and Another
• Kekatong Sdn Bhd v Danaharta Urus Sdn Bhd
• Wbm v Chief Commissioner of Police
• R (A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Juncal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Watkins v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others
• R v Secretary of State for The Home Department and Another
• R The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• R (Carroll) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Mellor
• R (Bewry) v Norwich City Council
• R (on the application of Privacy International) v Revenue and Customs Comrs
• Cullen v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
• R (on the application of ProLife Alliance) v British Broadcasting Corporation
• The King on the application of SPM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Medical Justice) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Taylor v The Chief Executive of The Department of Corrections
• Canterbury Regional Council v Independent Fisheries Ltd
• The Children's Rights Alliance for England v Secretary of State for Justice G4s Care and Justice Services (uk) Ltd and Another (Interested Parties)
• Expandable Ltd and Others v Rubin
• Hamzy v Commissioner of Corrective Services and the State of NSW
• J Robbins Capital Partners Ltd v Zamsort Ltd
• General Mediterranean Holdings SA v Patel and Another
• R (Mellor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Nadezda Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Lightfoot
• R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
• An Application for Judicial Review and GCR O.53 Between: (1) Maples Corporate Services Ltd (2) Maplesfs Ltd Plaintiffs v Cayman Islands Monetary Authority Defendant
• Watkins v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others
• Rowley v The Integrity Commission
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
• Momcilovic v The Queen
• PJSC National Bank Trust v Boris Mints
• R v Secretary of State for Social Security, ex parte Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants ; R v Secretary of State for Social Security, ex parte B
• Jitendra Chawla d.b.a Xtra House v Director of Immigration The Attorney General
• A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2)
• Seal v Chief Constable of South Wales Police

REFERRED in

• The Queen (on the application of Muhammad Shoaib) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Tan Chong Kean v Yeoh Tai Chuan and Another (both were practising as Messrs TC Yeoh & Co)
• Faridah Ariffin v Dr.Lee Hock Bee

[See more]

• Pro-Life Alliance v BBC
• Tan Chong Kean v Yeoh Tai Chuan and Another
• Kekatong Sdn Bhd v Danaharta Urus Sdn Bhd
• Sivarasa Rasiah v Badan Peguam Malaysia
• Pihak Berkuasa Tatatertib Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai and Another v Muziadi Mukhtar
• S v Airedale National Health Service Trust
• The Queen (on the application of Seth Kaitey) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Oxfordshire County Council v M
• R (oao (1) The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens, (2) O, a child, by her litigation friend, AO, and (3) A, a child, by her litigation friend, NJM) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Abubaker Arrbab
• Petition Of Stewart Potter (ap) V. The Scottish Ministers
• R Medical Justice v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King on the application of DM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Expandable Ltd and Others v Rubin
• R (Hirst) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Contact with Media)
• R (on the application of Badmus and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• DSD and NBV v The Parole Board of England and Wales
• R The Children's Rights Alliance for England v The Secretary of State for Justice G4s Care and Justice Services (uk) Ltd and Another (Interested Parties) The Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervener)
• International Transport Roth GmbH and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• PJSC National Bank Trust v Boris Mints
• Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Ponting) v Governor of HMP Whitemoor and Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R SPM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (M) v Ashworth Hospital Authority
• N v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CITED in

• W231/01A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
• Nafc v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
• Chim Shing Chung v Commissioner of Correctional Services

[See more]

• Holland v Governor of Portlaoise Prison
• R Mohammed Gul v Secretary of State for Justice and Another
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Mellor
• R Rights of Women v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
• B.P. EXPLORATION OPERATING Company Ltd Pursuers (Appellants) against CHEVRON TRANSPORT (SCOTLAND) Defenders (Respondents)
• R Xavier v The Governor of HMP Whitemoor and Another
• R (S) v City of Plymouth
• Rhian Lewis and Michael Ness v the Minister of Finance
• R v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Witham
• J Robbins Capital Partners Ltd v Zamsort Ltd
• Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
• Holland v Governor of Portlaois Prison
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson
• R (Youssef) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson
• Broadmoor Special Hospital Authority and Another v Robinson

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1993] 4 All ER 539
• [20/05/1993] TLR 8
• [1993] 3 WLR 1125

[See more]

• [1994] QB 198

APPLIED in

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Saleem
• R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor

This document cites

---

• R v Board of Visitors of Dartmoor Prison, ex parte Smith
• Parry-Jones v Law Society
• D— D—(Married Woman) (Plaintiff (Appellant) The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Defendants (Respondents)
• R v Chief Immigration Officer ex parte Salamat Bibi
• DPP v Hutchinson



See all quotations

• D. (Married Woman) (Respondent) v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Appellants)
• Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd and Others (No. 2)
• Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd and Others (No. 2)
• Raymond v Honey
• Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Anderson
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Leech
• Comfort Hotels Ltd v Wembley Stadium Ltd
• Leech v Secretary of State for Scotland
• DPP v Hutchinson
• Insolvency Act 1986
• Criminal Justice Act 1982
• Criminal Justice Act 1967
• Prison Act 1952
• Civil Evidence Act 1972
• Criminal Justice Act 1987
• Mental Health Act 1983
• Prison Rules 1964
• Prison (Scotland) Rules, 1952
• Golder v United Kingdom (App No 4451/70)
• Moorehead Shipping Pty Ltd v Chief Collector of Taxes [1990]