R v Schildkamp

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Beswick v Beswick
• Attorney General v Prince Ernest Augustus of Hanover

REFERS TO

• Qualter, Hall & Company Ltd v Board of Trade
• Attorney General v Prince Ernest Augustus of Hanover
• R v Hare

[See more]

• R v Surrey (North-Eastern Area) Assessment Committee, ex parte Surrey County Valuation Committee
• The Directors of the Hammersmith and City Railway Company v Brand
• Martins v Fowler
• Union Steamship Company of New Zealand v Melbourne Harbour Trust Commissioners
• Fletcher v Birkenhead Corporation
• Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse Company, Ltd
• Chandler and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions

FOLLOWS

• R v Rollafson
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Blott; Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Greenwood

CONSIDERS

• Companies Act 1929 - Articles : S-275
• Companies Act 1947
• Companies Act 1948

[See more]

• Companies Act 1948 - Articles : S-323
• Interpretation Act 1889 - Articles : S-8
• Factors Act 1889
• Factors Act 1889 - Articles : S-3
• Companies Act 1928
• Administration of Justice Act 1960 - Articles : S-1
• Companies Act 1928 - Articles : S-75
• Companies (Consolidation) Act 1908
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-205
• Bankruptcy Act 1914 - Articles : S-75
• Companies Act 1948 - Articles : S-187
• Factors (Scotland) Act 1890
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-56
• Companies Act 1929
• Beswick v Beswick
• Inglis v Robertson and Baxter
• Companies Act 1948 - Articles : S-332

RESUELVE RECURSO

• R v Schildkamp

AFFIRMS

• R v Schildkamp

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1969] UKHL J1127-1
• 54 CrAppR 90
• [1969] 3 All ER 1640

[See more]

• [1970] 2 WLR 279
• [1971] AC 1

CITED in

• Johnson (Inspector of Taxes) v Prudential Assurance Company Ltd
• Clement v Comcare
• Fair Work Ombudsman v Wongtas Pty Ltd

[See more]

• Morphites v Bernasconi and Others
• Padmore v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (No 2)
• Twu v School Bus Contractors Pty Ltd
• Lim Phin Khian v Kho Su Ming
• Amiri Flight Authority v BAE Systems Plc
• Amiri Flight Authority v BAE Systems Plc

CONSIDERED in

• Henry (Oswald) v Corrina Perry
• Mr James McGrath v London Borough of Camden
• The Queen v London Borough of Newham ex parte Peter Clive Watkins

[See more]

• R v Ian Leighton and Town & Country Refuse Collections Ltd
• R v North (Christopher)
• R (Green) v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court
• R (Wardle) v Leeds Crown Court
• DPP (Cth) v Helou, DPP (Cth) v Solomons
• One.Tel Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v John David Rich and Others
• X v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• Cruise Solutions Ltd Discovery Expeditions Ltd v The Commissioner of Genreal Sales Tax and The Attorney General
• Britton v Paul
• Commissioner of Mines and Attorney General v Glencore Alumina Jamaica Ltd
• D.P.P. v Ramsay
• ADM Londis Plc v Arman Retail Ltd
• R v Kelt
• Cyril James Page and Another v John Luke Lowther and Another
• K. Shoe Shops Ltd v David Brian Hardy (Valuation Officer) (The Appellant in the Court of Appeal) (First Respondent) The Lord Mayor Aldermen and Citizens of the City of Westminster (Second Respondent)
• Barclays Bank Plc and Another v HM Revenue and Customs
• R v Kemp
• Department of Public Prosecutions v Shannon
• R v Charles Okedare
• Hanlon v The Law Society
• R v Chief Adjudication Officer, ex parte B
• Jones v Governing Body of Burdett Coutts School
• Wong, Wen-Young v (1) Grand View Private Trust Company Ltd, (2) Transglobe Private Trust Company Ltd
• China Sinopharm International Corporation v Rivi Gardner & Associates Ltd
• XYZ v Real Assets (RA) Global Opportunity Fund
• Panton v The Attorney General of Jamaica
• David Penn Claimant v Governor of the Virgin Islands Respondent [ECSC]
• Howell v Bryan
• Attorney General of the Turks and Caicos Islands v Michael Eugene Misick, Floyd Basil Hall, McAllister Eugene Hanchell, Lillian Boyce, Jeffrey Christoval Hall, Clayton Stanfield Greene, Thomas Chalmers Misick, Lisa Michelle Hall and Melbourne Arthur Wilson
• Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Dominica v Williams et Al
• Dariusz Koper v Zurich Insurance Plc
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd

REFERRED in

• Jalal v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
• Mr James McGrath v London Borough of Camden
• Limb & Company (Stevedores) v British Transport Docks Board

[See more]

• Kedai Pajak Fah Ngien and Others v PP
• Foo Loke Ying and Another v Television Broadcasts Ltd and Others
• Alcontara; PP
• Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Dominica Appellant v [1] Miriam Williams [2] Philbert Bertrand [3] Edward Etinoffe Respondents [ECSC]
• Tradition Financial Services Ltd v Bilta (UK) Ltd and Others
• Krishna Moorthy v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs

This document cites

---

• Attorney General v Prince Ernest Augustus of Hanover
• Inglis v Robertson and Baxter
• Chandler and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions
• R v Rollafson
• R v Schildkamp



See all quotations

• Attorney General v Prince Ernest Augustus of Hanover
• Qualter, Hall & Company Ltd v Board of Trade
• Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse Company, Ltd
• Fletcher v Birkenhead Corporation
• R v Surrey (North-Eastern Area) Assessment Committee, ex parte Surrey County Valuation Committee
• R v Hare
• Beswick v Beswick
• Martins v Fowler
• Beswick v Beswick
• Union Steamship Company of New Zealand v Melbourne Harbour Trust Commissioners
• The Directors of the Hammersmith and City Railway Company v Brand
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Blott; Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Greenwood
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Companies Act 1929
• Factors Act 1889
• Interpretation Act 1889
• Companies Act 1947
• Bankruptcy Act 1914
• Factors (Scotland) Act 1890
• Companies (Consolidation) Act 1908
• Companies Act 1928
• Administration of Justice Act 1960
• Companies Act 1948