R v Rasool (Shafqat) ; R v Choudhary (Nassir Abbas)

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Stovin and Another v Norfolk County Council
• R v Sang
• R v Effik ; R v Mitchell

CONSIDERS

• R v Khan (Sultan)
• R v Aranguren and Others

DISTINGUISHES

• R v Preston (Stephen) ; R v Preston (Zena) ; R v Clarke ; R v Austen ; R v Salter

CONSIDERS

• Interception of Communications Act 1985 - Articles : S-1
• Interception of Communications Act 1985 - Articles : S-9
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 - Articles : S-78

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1997] 1 WLR 1092
• [1997] 4 All ER 439
• [17/02/1997] TLR 2

[See more]

• [1997] 2 CrAppR 190
• [1997] Crim LR 448

CITED in

• R v JM
• R v P (Telephone Intercepts: Admissibility of Evidence)

CONSIDERED in

• R v Ian Michael Sargent
• Attorney General's Reference (No 5 of 2002)
• R v Ian Michael Sargent

[See more]

• R v Owen ; R v Stephen
• Morgans v DPP
• R v Ian Michael Sargent
• Morgans v Director of Public Prosecution (pet. all.)
• R v Aujla (Ajit Singh)

This document cites

• Stovin and Another v Norfolk County Council
• R v Sang
• R v Preston (Stephen) ; R v Preston (Zena) ; R v Clarke ; R v Austen ; R v Salter
• R v Khan (Sultan)
• R v Effik ; R v Mitchell



See all quotations

• R v Aranguren and Others
• R v Effik ; R v Mitchell
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
• Interception of Communications Act 1985