R v Preece ; R v Howells

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• R v Jones and Bowerbank
• Department of Public Prosecutions v Shannon
• Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Ltd

REFERS TO

• R v Pearce
• Department of Public Prosecutions v Shannon
• Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Ltd

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• R v Hall

APPLIES

• R v Hunt
• R v Hornby and Peaple

CITES

• DPP v Burgess

CONSIDERS

• Sexual Offences Act 1956 - Articles : S-13
• Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885 - Articles : S-11
• Consolidation of Enactments (Procedure) Act 1949

[See more]

• Criminal Appeal Act 1968 - Articles : S-2

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1976] EWCA Crim J0219-7
• [1976] 2 All ER 690
• [1976] 140 JP 450

[See more]

• 63 CrAppR 28
• [1977] QB 370
• [1976] 2 WLR 749

CONSIDERED in

• Justin Paul Savage v The Queen
• The Queen v Trevor John Alexander and Elspeth McKenzie
• Crampton v R

[See more]

• The Queen v Y
• Burchall v R 1991 Civil Appeal No. 14
• The Queen v Peter James Coffey

DISTINGUISHED in

• Ng Huat v Public Prosecutor

CITED in

• Tucker v R, Dill v R
• P.P v Judges of Dublin Circuit Court

NOT APPLIED in

• P v Judges of the Circuit Court

REFERRED in

• PP v Judges of the Circuit Court

This document cites

---

• Department of Public Prosecutions v Shannon
• R v Hall
• Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Ltd
• R v Hunt
• Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Ltd



See all quotations

• Lim Yak Hua v Eastern & Oriental Hotel
• R v Pearce
• R v Jones and Bowerbank
• R v Hornby and Peaple
• Department of Public Prosecutions v Shannon
• DPP v Burgess
• Sexual Offences Act 1956
• Consolidation of Enactments (Procedure) Act 1949
• Vagrancy Act 1824
• Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885
• Criminal Appeal Act 1968