R v Larkin

Core Citations

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 29 CrAppR 18
• [1943] 1 All ER 217
• 59 TLR 105

[See more]

• [1943] KB 174

CITED in

• Burns v R
• Lennox Da Costa v The State
• Jackson v R

[See more]

• R v Tompson
• R v McKinnell

CONSIDERED in

• R v William Steffan Edwards
• R v Warwick Beech and Another
• R v Robert Jones and Another

[See more]

• Beckford (Emilio) and Kadett Brown v R
• R v Percival Moore
• R v Clifton Steele
• Lewis v R; Penados v R
• Pemble v R
• R v James Edward Standing
• R v Berry
• R v Nicholas
• Quintyne and Jones v R
• Mohammed v The State
• Baldath Rampersad v The State
• The Attorney General v Tucker
• Alex Wolffe v The Queen
• Alex Wolffe v The Queen
• R v Mitchell
• R v Goodfellow
• Huey Gowdie v R
• R v Carey, Coyle and Foster
• R v Berry (Linton)
• R v Steele
• Fernandez (a.k.a. Escobar), Re
• The State v Naipaul
• Gransaul et Al v R
• R v Bloomfield
• R v Moore
• Marco Chiro(Appellant) v The Queen
• Burns v The Queen
• R v Reid (Barry)
• R v Lavender
• R v Willoughby (Keith Calverley)
• R v Church
• R v Greenland
• DPP v Stonehouse
• R v Wang (Cheong)
• R v Harrison
• R v Coutts (Graham James)

REFERRED in

• R v Jarmain
• R v Healey
• DPP v Jones

[See more]

• Gray v Barr
• Khoon Chye Hin v Public Prosecutor
• R v Simon Kennedy
• R v John Farnon and Nia Ellis
• DPP v Mahon
• R v Scarlett
• R v Dalby
• R v Governor of Holloway Prison, ex parte Jennings

APPLIED in

• R v Black (Practice Note)
• R v McCaulsky (Jermaine)
• DPP v Newbury ; DPP v Jones

[See more]

• Gray v Barr

DISTINGUISHED in

• R v Healey

FOLLOWED in

• Abdul Razak v PP

RELIED UPON in

• Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 1994)