R v King

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• House v R
• R v Giam (No. 2)
• R v Mostyn

[See more]

• R v Tran
• Dinsdale v R
• R v Cocking
• R v Hearne
• Application by Attorney General under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for a Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under Section 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No. 3 of 2002)
• Pearce v R
• Lupton v R
• R v Baker
• Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd
• Wong v R
• R v way
• R v Berg
• R v Zamagias
• R v De Simoni
• R v AEM Snr; R v KEM; R v MM
• Jago v District Court (Nsw)
• R v M A
• Attorney General's Application Under S37 of The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 NO 2 of 2002
• R v King
• R v Leslie Kalache
• R v Cramp
• R v Wall
• R v Thomson; R v Houlton
• R v Slack
• Mills v R
• R v Wickham
• R v Stringer

CONSIDERED in

• R v F.D; R v F.D; R v J.D
• Howard Hall(First Appellant) v The Queen
• R v Knight

[See more]

• David Morse (Office of State Revenue) v Chan and Anor
• R v Borg
• R v Thompson
• R v Farmer
• R v Laurence Bede O'Connor
• R v RHB
• R v Robinson
• R v Shepherd
• R v White
• R v Dehaybi; R v Jd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2004] NSWCCA 444

CITED in

• R v Alvin Tuala

This document cites

• Khan v. College of Physicians and Surgeons (Ont.) et al., (1992) 57 O.A.C. 115 (CA)
• R. v. Sullivan and Lemay, (1991) 122 N.R. 166 (SCC)
• Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.), [1997] 3 SCR 925
• R v Leslie Kalache
• R v Hearne



See all quotations

• Dinsdale v R
• R v M A
• R v Tran
• R v Baker
• Lupton v R
• R v Stringer
• Attorney General's Application Under S37 of The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 NO 2 of 2002
• R v Wall
• Application by Attorney General under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for a Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under Section 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No. 3 of 2002)
• R v Thomson; R v Houlton
• R v Slack
• R v King
• R v Cramp
• R v Mostyn
• R v Berg
• R v Giam (No. 2)
• R v Wickham
• Wong v R
• R v way
• R v Cocking
• R v AEM Snr; R v KEM; R v MM
• R v Zamagias
• Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd
• Griffiths v R
• R v De Simoni
• Veen v R
• Mills v R
• Jago v District Court (Nsw)
• Malvaso v R
• Everett v R