R v Kellett

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• R v Epping and Harlow Justices, ex parte Massaro

REFERS TO

• Skipworth's Case
• R v Falconer-Atlee
• Shaw v Shaw

[See more]

• R v Andrews
• R v Panayiotou
• R v Odhams Press Ltd ex parte Attorney General
• R v Vreones
• R v Tibbits and Windust
• R v Grimes (Note)
• Watson v Jones or McEwan et è contra

CONSIDERS

• Criminal Justice Act 1948
• Proceedings in the Star-Chamber against Dr. john williams, Bishop of Lincoln, for publishing false News and Tales to the Scandal of HM”s Government; for revealing Counsels of State contrary to his Oath of a Privy Counsellor, and for tampering with the King”s Witnesses:
• Criminal Justice Act 1967 - Articles : S-8

[See more]

• Witnesses (Public Inquiries) Protection Act 1892 - Articles : S-2
• Perjury Act 1911 - Articles : S-7

APPLIES

• The King v Johnson
• Attorney General v Butterworth
• Chapman v Honig

[See more]

• R v Mohan
• Shaw v Shaw

DISTINGUISHES

• Webster v Bakewell Rural Council

CONSIDERED in

• R v Amjed Malik Iqbal
• R v John Francis Cromack and Another
• R The Secretary of State of the Home Department ex parte Michael O'Brien and Another The Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Liam O'Dhuibhir

[See more]

• R v Darren OSBOURNE
• R v Raymond Maurice Race
• R Ricky Lee v The Criminal Cases Review Commission
• Live Group Pty Ltd and Another v Rabbi Ulman and Ors
• Scott James Poynder v Graham Kent and Others
• Peach Grey & Company v Sommers
• Versloot Dredging Bv v Hdi Gerling Industrie Versicherung Ag & 6 Others
• Nixon v The Attorney General
• Farahbakht v Midas Australia Pty Ltd
• R v Lalani
• The Attorney General v Charles David Barnett
• R v Lynch
• The State v Barrow

APPLIED in

• Hatty v Pilkinton (No 2)
• Peach Grey & Company v Sommers
• Connolly v Dale

DISTINGUISHED in

• Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Timania Pty Ltd(40)

CITED in

• R v Von Cork (Norma), Moore (Christopher) et Al
• Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu v Cridlandspty Ltd
• R v Rogerson

[See more]

• Foord v Whiddett
• R v Brendan McConville and John Paul Wootton
• R v Kenny
• R v Rowell

REFERRED in

• Clarkson v the Mandarin Club Ltd
• Meissner v R
• Achieva Technology Sdn Bhd v Lam Yen Ling

[See more]

• Attorney General v Lokman Noor bin Adam
• Lokman Noor bin Adam v Pendakwa Raya (and Another Appeal)
• R v Rafique ; R v Sajid ; R v Rajah
• Filatona Trading Ltd v Navigator Equities Ltd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1975] 3 All ER 468
• 61 CrAppR 240
• [1976] 140 JP 1

[See more]

• [1975] 3 WLR 713
• [1976] QB 372

CLARIFIED in

• R v Toney

This document cites

---

• R v Andrews
• Chapman v Honig
• R v Panayiotou
• R v Falconer-Atlee
• Attorney General v Butterworth



See all quotations

• Watson v Jones or McEwan et è contra
• R v Mohan
• The King v Johnson
• Webster v Bakewell Rural Council
• Shaw v Shaw
• R v Vreones
• R v Epping and Harlow Justices, ex parte Massaro
• R v Odhams Press Ltd ex parte Attorney General
• Shaw v Shaw
• R v Tibbits and Windust
• R v Grimes (Note)
• Skipworth's Case
• Proceedings in the Star-Chamber against Dr. john williams, Bishop of Lincoln, for publishing false News and Tales to the Scandal of HM”s Government; for revealing Counsels of State contrary to his Oath of a Privy Counsellor, and for tampering with the King”s Witnesses:
• Perjury Act 1911
• Criminal Justice Act 1967
• Criminal Justice Act 1948
• Criminal Procedure Act 1851
• Witnesses (Public Inquiries) Protection Act 1892