R v Jones (E. J. M.)

Core Citations

---

DISAPPROVES

• Trigg v Griffin

CONSIDERS

• R v Hart, Millar and Robert Millar (Contractors) Ltd

REFERS TO

• Webber v Carey ; DPP v Carey
• Hanway v Boultbee and Mary his Wife
• Griffith v Taylor; Taylor v Griffith; Thatcher v Taylor

[See more]

• R v George Howarth

CONSIDERS

• Pinner v Everett
• Road Safety Act 1967 - Articles : S-2
• Road Safety Act 1967 - Articles : S-1

[See more]

• Larceny Act 1861 - Articles : S-103

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 54 CrAppR 148
• [1970] 1 All ER 209
• [1970] 134 JP 215

[See more]

• [1970] RTR 56
• [1970] 1 WLR 211

CONSIDERED in

• Sakhuja v Allen
• Shackleton v Chief Constable of Lancashire Police
• R v way

[See more]

• R v Surendra Kumar Sakhuja
• R v Estop
• R v Ian Duncan Auker-Howlett
• R v Farrance
• Wilson v State of New South Wales
• Pemberton v Attorney General, Pendenque and Constance
• Justin Pemberton Claimant v 1. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Dominica 2. Inspector Mervin Pendenque 3. Police Constable Delbert Constance Defendants [ECSC]

REFERRED in

• Sasson v Taverner
• Brooks v Ellis
• Lambert v Roberts

[See more]

• DPP v Stonehouse

FOLLOWED in

• Sasson v Taverner

APPLIED in

• R v Guttridge
• R v Thorpe (Thomas)

APPROVED in

• Practice Direction (Costs: Successful Defendants)
• R v Bates
• R v Sakhuja

This document cites

---

• Pinner v Everett
• Griffith v Taylor; Taylor v Griffith; Thatcher v Taylor
• Trigg v Griffin
• Hanway v Boultbee and Mary his Wife
• R v George Howarth



See all quotations

• Webber v Carey ; DPP v Carey
• R v Hart, Millar and Robert Millar (Contractors) Ltd
• Larceny Act 1861
• Road Safety Act 1967