R v Hyde ; R v Sussex ; R v Collins

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• R v Wakely
• R v Anderson; R v Morris

ACLARA

• R v Slack

APPLIES

• Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1991) 155 JPN 58
• (1991) 155 JPN 58
• [1990] 3 All ER 892

[See more]

• 92 CrAppR 131
• [1991] Crim LR 133
• [1990] 134 SJ 1190
• [1991] 155 JP 430
• [08/10/1990] TLR 4
• [1990] 3 WLR 1115
• [1991] 1 QB 134

APPLIED in

• R v Roberts (Kelvin)
• Hui Chi-ming v The Queen
• [1] Craig Smith [2] Clayton Francis [3] Noel Melvin [4] Marlon Phoenix Appellants v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]

CITED in

• R v D
• Guerra (Lincoln) and Wallen (Brian) v The State (No 2)
• R v Jogee

REFERRED in

• Mcauliffe (Sp) v R; Mcauliffe (Dj) v R
• R v Rook
• Gillard v R

[See more]

• R v Rahman (Islamur) and Others
• R v Gnango
• R v Jogee
• R v S (MN) and Others

APPROVED in

• R v Hui Chi-ming

CONSIDERED in

• R v Gary Mohammed Shaffi and Others
• R v A and Others
• Nathan Smith v The Queen

[See more]

• Taitt and Another v R
• Duong Hai Nguyen v R, Atcn v R, Khanh Hoang Nguyen v R, Minh Thy Huynh v R
• Guerra and Another v The State
• R v Bikic
• R v Greatrex
• R v Po Ming Li and Others
• Everard John Miller(Appellant) v The Queen
• R v Novakovic and Others (Rulings 2–4)
• Roberts, Stephens and Day
• Mitchell v The King; Rigney v The King; Carver v The King; Tenhoopen v The King
• R v Neary (Graham Robert)
• Adams (Peter) and Archer (Michael) v The State
• Rabindra Deo v The State
• Smith, Francis, Melvin and Phoenix v The Queen
• Ashby (Glen) v The State
• R v Stewart (Benjamin James)
• Taitt and Gooding v The Queen
• Deo v The State
• R v Craig Brian Bryce
• Alton Heath and Others v R
• R v Uddin
• Ashby v The State
• Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 2004)
• R v Carpenter
• R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)
• R v Rahman (Islamur) and Others

FOLLOWED in

• Taitt v R, Gooding v R

DISTINGUISHED in

• R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)

This document cites

---

• R v Anderson; R v Morris
• R v Wakely
• Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen
• R v Slack