R v Hertfordshire County Council, ex parte Green Environmental Industries Ltd and another

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Trachtenberg, ex parte

CONSIDERS

• Criminal Evidence Act 1898
• R v Director of Serious Fraud Office, ex parte Smith
• Environmental Protection Act 1990 - Articles : S-71

[See more]

• Criminal Evidence Act 1898
• Companies Act 1985 - Articles : S-432
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 - Articles : S-78
• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981 - Articles : S-72
• Theft Act 1968 - Articles : S-31
• Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Environment Act 1995
• Control of Pollution (Amendment) Act 1989 - Articles : S-1
• Environmental Protection Act 1990 - Articles : S-33
• Environmental Protection Act 1990 - Articles : S-59
• Banking Act 1987
• Companies Act 1985 - Articles : S-434
• Waste Management Licensing Regulations 1994
• Environmental Protection (Duty of Care) Regulations 1991
• Environment Act 1995
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
• Banking Act 1987
• Companies Act 1985
• Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Environmental Protection Act 1990

REFERS TO

• Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell; Cooper v Maxwell; Mirror Group Newspapers Plc v Maxwell
• Re Arrows Ltd (No. 4); Re Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd; Re Headington Investments Ltd

[See more]

• Re London United Investments Plc
• Lam Chi-ming v The Queen
• R v Saunders ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Lyons
• Bank of England v Riley and Another
• R v Warickshall
• Istel (AT & T) Ltd v Tully
• R v DPP, ex parte Kebeline
• Dyson v Attorney General

RESUELVE RECURSO

• R v Hertfordshire County Council, ex parte Green Environmental Industries Ltd and another

CITES

• Hamilton and Another v Naviede and Director of the Serious Fraud Office
• R v Director of Serious Fraud Office, ex parte Smith
• Re Headington Investments

[See more]

• R v DPP ex parte Kebeline
• Istel (AT & T) Ltd v Tully

DISTINGUISHES

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2000] UKHL J0217-5
• 17/02/2000 Daily Cases
• [2000] 4 LRC 217

[See more]

• [2000] 1 All ER 773
• [1998] Env LR 153
• [2000] 1 PLR 108
• 96 LGR 417
• [22/02/2000] TLR 6
• [2000] 2 WLR 373
• [2000] 2 AC 412

CITED in

• A v Boulton
• Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Crane and Another
• Child Maintenance Enforcement Commission v Forrest

[See more]

• Gold Nuts Ltd and Others v The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs
• In the Matter of an Application by Marshall Taggart for Judicial Review
• S J Brockbank v William Anthony Shannon
• Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission
• O Ltd and Z
• National Crime Agency v Mrs A
• R v Allen

REFERRED in

• A v Boulton
• Dato' Sreesanthan Eliathamby v Public Prosecutor
• Volaw Trust and Corporate Services Ltd and its Directors and Others v The Office of the Comptroller of Taxes and another

[See more]

• The Queen (on the application of RJ) v The Director of Legal Aid Casework HM Senior Coroner for Manchester (City Area) (Interested Party)
• Beghal v DPP
• R (on the application of River East Supplies Ltd) v The Crown Court at Nottingham Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police and Another (Interested Parties)
• National Crime Agency v Mrs A
• Zamira Hajiyeva v National Crime Agency

CONSIDERED in

• The Queen Stephen Anthony Trutch (Appellants) Jeanne Mary Trutch
• Beghal v DPP
• R v Kansal (Yash Pal) (Change of Law) (No 2)

[See more]

• R v Kearns (Nicholas Gary)

APPLIED in

• R (Bright) v Central Criminal Court

This document cites

---

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Re London United Investments Plc
• Hamilton and Another v Naviede and Director of the Serious Fraud Office
• R v DPP ex parte Kebeline
• Bank of England v Riley and Another



See all quotations

• Istel (AT & T) Ltd v Tully
• Istel (AT & T) Ltd v Tully
• Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell; Cooper v Maxwell; Mirror Group Newspapers Plc v Maxwell
• R v Saunders ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Lyons
• Dyson v Attorney General
• R v Warickshall
• Lam Chi-ming v The Queen
• R v Director of Serious Fraud Office, ex parte Smith
• R v Director of Serious Fraud Office, ex parte Smith
• Re Arrows Ltd (No. 4); Re Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd; Re Headington Investments Ltd
• Re Headington Investments
• R v DPP, ex parte Kebeline
• Trachtenberg, ex parte
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
• Environment Act 1995
• Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999
• Theft Act 1968
• Criminal Evidence Act 1898
• Control of Pollution (Amendment) Act 1989
• Banking Act 1987
• Companies Act 1985
• Environmental Protection Act 1990
• Regulation No 17 First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Courts Act, 1981