R v Greater London Council, ex parte Blackburn

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• R v Stanley

REFERS TO

• R v Hereford Corpn.ex parte Harrower
• Dyson v Attorney General
• R v Staniforth ; DPP v Jordan

[See more]

• R v Thames Magistrates Court, ex parte Greenbaum
• London County Council v Bermondsey Bioscope Company
• R v Saunders
• R v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, ex parte Blackburn
• R v Hicklin
• R v Paddington Valuation Officer. ex parte Peachey Property Corporation Ltd
• Bradbury v Enfield London Borough Council
• Prescott v Birmingham Corporation
• Attorney General ex rel. McWhirter v Independent Broadcasting Authority
• R v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, ex parte Blackburn (No. 3)

APPLIES

• R v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd

APPROVES

• Mills v London County Council
• R v Stanley
• R v London County Council. ex parte Entertainments Protection Association, Ld

[See more]

• Ellis v Dubowski

CONSIDERS

• Obscene Publications Act 1959 - Articles : S-1
• Cinematograph Act 1952 - Articles : S-3
• Cinematograph Act 1909 - Articles : S-2

[See more]

• Cinematograph Act 1909
• Obscene Publications Act 1959
• Cinematograph Act 1952
• Post Office Act 1953 - Articles : S-11
• Television Act 1964
• Theatres Act 1968

CONSIDERED in

• R v Birmingham City District Council, ex parte O
• Wide Bay Conservation Council Inc. v Burnett Water Pty Ltd (No 8)
• Re Issacs

[See more]

• North v Westminster City Council
• Arsenal Football Club Ltd v Ende
• Re Harrideo Sookdeo
• Poitier et Al v Methodist Church of the Bahamas et Al; The Bahamas District of the Methodist Church in the Caribbean and the America et Al v Symonette et Al
• Chase Merchant Bankers Jamaica Ltd et Al v Rose Hall Ltd et Al
• Poitier et Al v Methodist Church of the Bahamas et Al
• Dumas v The Attorney General
• Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis ex parte Albert Raymond Blackburn
• Poitier et Al v Methodist Church of the Bahamas et Al
• Poitier et Al v Methodist Church of the Bahamas et Al
• [1] Hon. Shawn K. Richards [2] Hon. Timothy Harris [3] Hon. Eugene A. Hamilton [4] Hon. Mark Brantley Applicants v [1] The Constituency Boundaries Commission [2] His Excellency the Governor General [3] The Prime Minister of St. Christopher and Nevis [4] Attorney General of St Christopher and Nevis Respondents [ECSC]
• Spencer v The Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda et Al
• Prescott et Al v Henry
• Re Gaskin Ramon
• Francois v The Attorney General
• Benjamin et Al v The Honourable Minister of Information and Broadcasting et Al
• Lionel v Attorney General of St. Lucia
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd
• Goodwin v Spencer and Simon
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd
• Moncrief-Spittle v Regional Facilities Auckland Ltd
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd

CITED in

• Grass v Minister for Immigration
• Chan Hiang Leng Colin and Others v Minister for Information and the Arts

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Barrs v Bethell

REFERRED in

• R v Legal Aid Board, ex parte Clark
• United Malayan Realty Sdn Bhd v Kanawagi Seperumaniam & Other Appealsalbilt kareem
• Lim Cho Hock v Government of State of Perak, Menteri Besar, State of Perak and President, Municipality of Ipoh

[See more]

• Mohamed bin Ismail; Tan Sri Haji Othman Saat
• Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Siang & United Engineers (M) Bhd v Lim Kit Siang
• Chan Hiang Leng Colin and Others v Minister for Information and the Arts
• Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General
• Arsenal Football Club Ltd v Ende
• R v Horsham Justices, ex parte Farquharson
• O'Reilly v Mackman

FOLLOWED in

• Mohamed bin Ismail v Tan Sri Haji Osman Saat and Others
• George John v Goh Eng Wah Bros Filem Sdn Bhd and Others
• State Legislative Assembly of Sabah and Another; Tun Datuk Haji Mustapha bin Datuk Harun

[See more]

• Chan Hiang Leng Colin and Others v Minister for Information and the Arts
• Tan Eng Hong v AG

COMMENTED in

• Augustin Lionel Applicant v The Honourable Attorney-General Respondent [ECSC]

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1976] 3 All ER 184
• 74 LGR 464
• [1976] 140 JP 617

[See more]

• [1976] 1 WLR 550

This document cites

---

• R v Paddington Valuation Officer. ex parte Peachey Property Corporation Ltd
• Bradbury v Enfield London Borough Council
• R v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, ex parte Blackburn (No. 3)
• R v Stanley
• R v Staniforth ; DPP v Jordan



See all quotations

• Prescott v Birmingham Corporation
• R v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, ex parte Blackburn
• R v Thames Magistrates Court, ex parte Greenbaum
• Dyson v Attorney General
• R v London County Council. ex parte Entertainments Protection Association, Ld
• R v Stanley
• London County Council v Bermondsey Bioscope Company
• Mills v London County Council
• Ellis v Dubowski
• R v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd
• R v Hereford Corpn.ex parte Harrower
• Attorney General ex rel. McWhirter v Independent Broadcasting Authority
• R v Saunders
• R v Hicklin
• Obscene Publications Act 1959
• Theatres Act 1968
• Television Act 1964
• Post Office Act 1953
• Cinematograph Act 1952
• Cinematograph Act 1909