R v Glennon

Core Citations

---

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Tuckiar v R

REFERS TO

• Victoria v Australian Building Construction Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation

CONSIDERS

• Barton v R
• Jago v District Court (Nsw)
• R v Benz

[See more]

• Packer v Peacock Burrell v Peacock Smart v Peacock
• Butera v Director Ofpublic Prosecutions (Vic)

CITES

• Duff v R
• Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Maxwell v DPP

[See more]

• A-G for New South Wales v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1985)
• R v Thomson Newspapers Ltd.ex parte Attorney-General
• Michael Abdul Malik
• R v Lee
• R v Darby
• Carver v A-G for New South Wales
• R v Shrestha

APPLIES

• Re Bread Manufacturers Ltd

FOLLOWS

• Murphy v R
• R v Weaver
• Davern v Messel

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 173 CLR 592
• 106 ALR 177

CONSIDERED in

• Barakat v R
• Jaafar Dia v R
• Barry John Wells v The Queen

[See more]

• Bush v R
• SC v R
• Colin Lee Johnson(Appellant) v Crown
• Rulingr v Cardamone
• Brent Clark v The Queen
• Tootle v R
• James Stanley Kelly v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT)
• R v Trong Ruyen Bui
• R v Brewer
• Belal Saadallah Khazaal v Crown
• R v Forbes
• Skaf, Bilal v R Skaf, Mohammed v R This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments
• Marlow, Michael John Kelly, Shane Leslie v R
• Antonios Sajih Mokbel v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth)
• Burrell v R
• The Queen v Vijay Gakhar
• Crown v Wayne Moore
• KJS v R
• Hamdi Alqudsi(Applicant) v The Queen
• R v RD
• Dietrich v R
• Hollingsworth v The Queen
• Scott v R
• Samadi and Djait v R
• R v Abdaly; R v Hosseinishoja (No 5)
• R v Merrick
• R v Khan (No 6)
• R v Jenkin and Ors
• R v Medich (No 2)
• R v Farhad Qaumi
• Director of Public Prosecutions (Plaintiff) v Tony Rugari ((First defendant))
• R(Crown) v Louise Catherine Spiteri-Ahern (Accused)
• R (Crown) v Roger Caleb Rogerson (Accused)
• R v Haile
• R v Seller R v McCarthy
• Commissioner of Police R v Maher Aouli
• Nationwide News Pty Ltd(First Appellant) v Mumtaz Qaumi (First Respondent)
• R v Camelo-Gomez
• R v Ronald Edward Medich (No. 31)
• R v Watson
• R v Hg; R v We (No 1)
• R(Crown) v Zlatan Popovic (Accused)
• Nationwide News, Fairfax and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation(Intervenors) v R (the Applicant)
• R v Farhad Qaumi
• R v Dawson
• R v Farhad Qaumi
• Arthur John Humphries v R
• Police v Dunstall
• R (Crown) v Roger Caleb Rogerson (Accused)
• Robert Lindsay Hughes v R
• R v Farhad Qaumi
• Hamide v R
• Tomlinson v R
• Rogerson v R; McNamara v R
• The Queen v Edwards
• Dawson v R
• Daylia Brown v The Queen
• Tony Strickland (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Donald Galloway (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Edmund Hodges (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Rick Tucker (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
• R v Seller
• R v Dawson
• Belkheir v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
• Habambo v R
• The State v Alphonso
• R v Abrahams
• Ilievski v R; Nolan v R (No 2)
• Burton v R

CITED in

• O'neill v Mann
• New Zealand v Venkataya
• Slavko Percerep v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

[See more]

• Luke Edward Amos v R
• Malcolm Huntley Potier v R
• R v Michael Scott
• X7 v Crown
• Crown v Tony James Simmons
• The Queen v Andre Penn
• Brian Rattigan v DPP

REFERRED in

• R v Davis
• Farrell v R
• Jamal v R

[See more]

• Webb v R
• Moti v The Queen
• Brian Rattigan v DPP
• Bonnett Taylor v The Queen

APPLIED in

• Dupas v The Queen

REVERSED in

• Glennon v R

FOLLOWED in

• DPP v Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Ltd

This document cites

---

• Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Maxwell v DPP
• Michael Abdul Malik
• Duff v R
• Carver v A-G for New South Wales



See all quotations

• Victoria v Australian Building Construction Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation
• Davern v Messel
• Re Bread Manufacturers Ltd
• R v Thomson Newspapers Ltd.ex parte Attorney-General
• A-G for New South Wales v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1985)
• Packer v Peacock Burrell v Peacock Smart v Peacock
• Barton v R
• R v Darby
• Butera v Director Ofpublic Prosecutions (Vic)
• Murphy v R
• Jago v District Court (Nsw)
• R v Benz
• R v Shrestha
• R v Weaver
• Tuckiar v R
• R v Lee