R v Funderburk

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• R v Viola
• R v Busby
• Attorney General v Hitchcock

APPLIES

• R v Sweet-Escott

DISTINGUISHES

• R v Cargill

CONSIDERS

• Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976 - Articles : S-2
• Criminal Procedure Act 1865 - Articles : S-4
• Criminal Procedure Act 1865

[See more]

• Common Law Procedure Act 1854

CONSIDERED in

• R v Farai Alexio Usayi
• R v John Kevin Irish
• R v Edward Adams

[See more]

• R v Jan Graham Walker
• R v Alfred Ernest Walker
• R v Benjamin Johnson
• R v H (Steven)
• R v Edward Adams
• R v Ajaib Khan Rasib Khan
• R v Chandu Nagrecha
• R v Clive Peare James
• R v Shaun Michael Stokes
• The Queen v Paul Janima
• The Queen v Werner Paul Roberts
• R v Peter Mader
• R v AB
• R v Michael John Willshire
• R v Brewster and another
• Adam Peacock v R & Brendan Peacock v R
• Nicholls v the Queen
• The Queen v Steven David Tobin
• Chartered Professional Accountants of Alberta (Complaints Inquiry Committee) v Mathison,
• R v John Christopher Smith
• Brown et Al v The Queen
• R v Scott (Peter)
• R v Sheikh Fateh Elahee
• R v Labrador
• Kevin Peterkin v R
• Bethel v R
• R v Guney
• W.C. v DPP
• Director of Public Prosecutions v WC
• Vattekaden v DPP
• R v Soma

FOLLOWED in

• Natta v Canham
• R v Nagrecha

REFERRED in

• R v Paul Stephen Robinson
• R v Mazhar Ali
• R v Jamie Richard Garnham

[See more]

• R v T; R v H

CITED in

• R v Leigh Goddard
• Brown and McLaughlin v R
• R v Salaam David All Hilly

[See more]

• Waqas Iftikhar Hussain v R
• Tiwari v State of Trinidad and Tobago

DOUBTED in

• R v Edwards (John)

APPLIED in

• W.C. v The Director of Public Prosecutions

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 90 CrAppR 466
• [1990] 2 All ER 482
• [1990] 1 WLR 587

This document cites

---

• R. v. Bazinet, (1986) 14 O.A.C. 15 (CA)
• R v Busby
• R v Viola
• Attorney General v Hitchcock
• R v Cargill



See all quotations

• R v Sweet-Escott
• Common Law Procedure Act 1854
• Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976
• Criminal Procedure Act 1865