R v Brislan; ex parte Williams

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Attorney General v Edison Telephone Company of London

CONSIDERS

• Postmaster-General v National Telephone Company

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 54 CLR 262
• [1936] Arg LR 45

CITED in

• Advanced Hair Studio Pty Ltd v Tvw Enterprises Ltd
• King v Jones
• Theophanous v the Herald and Weekly Times Ltd

[See more]

• Nintendo Company Ltd v Centronics Systems Pty Ltd

CONSIDERED in

• Snyman v Cooper
• Austereo Ltd v Trade Practices Commission

APPLIED in

• Telstra Corporation Ltd v Hurstville City Council
• Jones v Commonwealth (No 1 & 2)

REFERRED in

• Carter v Egg and Egg Pulp Marketing Board (Victoria)
• Bayside City Council v Telstra Corporation Ltd

This document cites

• Postmaster-General v National Telephone Company
• Attorney General v Edison Telephone Company of London