R REID v NEIL LITHERLAND (FIRST DEFENDANT) and DAME JANE ROBERTS London Borough of CAMDEN
Linked as:
Extract
R REID v NEIL LITHERLAND (FIRST DEFENDANT) and DAME JANE ROBERTS London Borough of CAMDEN
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Attorney General v Wheen
- R (Sivasubramaniam) v Wandsworth County Court ; R (Sivasubramaniam) v Kingston upon Thames County Court and another (Lord Chancellor's Department intervening)
- Attorney General v Barker
REFERS TO
- Attorney General v Barker
- R (Sivasubramaniam) v Wandsworth County Court ; R (Sivasubramaniam) v Kingston upon Thames County Court and another (Lord Chancellor's Department intervening)
CONSIDERS
- Finance (No. 2) Act 1987 - Articles : S-39
- Criminal Justice Act 2003 - Articles : SCH-21
- Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981 - Articles : S-42
This document cites
- R (Sivasubramaniam) v Wandsworth County Court ; R (Sivasubramaniam) v Kingston upon Thames County Court and another (Lord Chancellor's Department intervening)
- R (Sivasubramaniam) v Wandsworth County Court ; R (Sivasubramaniam) v Kingston upon Thames County Court and another (Lord Chancellor's Department intervening)
- Attorney General v Barker
- Attorney General v Barker
- Attorney General v Wheen
