R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Shala v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Kacaj (Article 3 – Standard of Proof – Non-State Actors)

[See more]

• R (L and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• R (Yogathas) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Mahmood) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Edore v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department

RESUELVE RECURSO

• R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CONSIDERS

• Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• Human Rights Act 1998

[See more]

• Asylum and Immigration Act 1996 - Articles : S-2
• Immigration Act 1971

CONSIDERED in

• P v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Sj (Issue of Risk of Suicide in UK and in Country of Origin)
• MK (Mental Illness – Articles 3 and 8)

[See more]

• OG (Article 8 - Proportionality)
• SR (Credibility - Fact Finding)
• Johnson v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• A (Article 8 - Family Life - Proportionality - Mahamood)
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v KARUNAKARAN KAPILAN
• R Nadesu v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Sopa and Others, R v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Shane Shrimpton v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• S v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MC (Article 3:- Suicide –Preventive Measures)
• TA (Homosexuality - Family life - Immigration Rules)
• JN (Deportation _ Conviction _ Public Transport _ Proportionality)
• CI (Link to Mobutu)
• R ABDULLAH ABDI HUSSEIN v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• K, R v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R MOHAMMED HUSSEIN ALI v The ASYLUM and IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
• MEL IBIOU v Secretary of State for the Home Department/
• MK (Proportionality - Application of Edore)
• P (Risk - Failed Asylum Seekers)
• SA (No Risk in Removal Country)
• R Mehmet Tozlukaya v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Tamarevichute v Government of the Russian Federation
• HR (Proportionality)
• Antonovic v The Prosecutor Generals Office (a Lithuanian Judicial Authority)
• AM (Serious consequences)
• DF ­­(Article 8 - Proportionality: consideration of relevant factors)
• JA (Fresh Evidence - Psychiatric Treatment)
• HD (Long _ Unlawful _ Residence _ Proportionality)
• TS (Psychiatric Treatment - Articles 3 and 8)
• VK (Professional Handwritten Grounds not Acceptable)
• XH (Art 8 - Role of HOPO)
• Sarah Barigye Nsubuga (Applicant/Applicant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Vujnovic v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• BL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Kirubaharan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• RJ (Article8 - Proportionality - Inability to Comply)
• Ar TM (Withdrawl of Asylum Grounds - Consequences)
• R MARK DEDA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• KK (Risk – Return - Suicide – Roma)
• MP [Trafficking – Sufficiency of Protection]
• RG (Suicide - Risk - Razgar Considered)
• AY (Article 8 – Family life – Proportionality)
• EM (Sufficiency of Protection - Article 8)
• R (Tozlukaya) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (IR) v (1) Dr G Shetty (2) Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Djali v Immigration Appeal Tribunal
• R GOWRI GNANAMURTHY v IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL and The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• WAAAW (Family Reunion - Proportionality)
• AU (Identifying Issues - Article 8 - Procedure)
• Donovan Fullwood v Immigration Appeal Tribunal & Others
• GS (Article 8 - Private life - Edore and Razgar)
• EW (R) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• SADIA ABDI and The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• J(Article 8- Queue Jumping- Visa Applications-Neighbouring Countries)
• MM (Art 8- Shala - Delay)
• R EW v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• DN (Article 8 - Balancing - Delay - Shala - Concession)
• Y A (R) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of Astrit Kurtaj) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MD (Imprisonment in UK – Article 8)
• SB (Art 8 _ Mental Health _ Razgara Djali)
• R D v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The District Court of Jelena Gora (Poland) v Augusciak
• FM (Articles 3/8 in medical cases)
• R BESIM DUCJA v IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
• R (Gedara) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• JS (Sri Lanka)
• R (Gordon Binomugisha) v Southwark London Borough Council
• R (Ajoh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Mendes Machado v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Batayav v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• J v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• M (Croatia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Adalberto Jesus De Almeida v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
• AG (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• N v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (KH) (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Abu-Qulbain v Same; Kashmiri v Same
• SS v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AC v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R AGIM GASHI v IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL [QBD, 08/03/2004]
• RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Dada and Others v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
• Petition For Judicial View By J.o.
• WM (DRC) and another v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Nadarajah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Atkinson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Norris v Government of the United States of America (No 2)
• Ashish Balajigari v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Nadarajah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CITED in

• Dedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• CJ (Dominica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Stamp v Bermuda

[See more]

• Patel v (on the application of Patel) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Dick Lutalo v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Mirza) v Secretary of State for Home Department
• The Queen (on the Application of Saseendra Elayathamby) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Clue) v Birmingham City Council
• R (Kiana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Yusuf (Sahra)) v Parole Board
• Kishor Dangol (ap) V. Secretary Of State Of For The Home Department
• R (MN (Tanzania)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• M.E.O. (Nigeria) v The Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform
• The King on the application of AF v Milton Keynes Council
• R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REFERRED in

• MM and SA (Pankina: Near-Miss) Pakistan
• PT (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Yusuf) v Parole Board

[See more]

• VT (Dublin Regulations: Post-Removal Appeal) Sri Lanka
• Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another v Kizhar Hayat (Pakistan) and Another
• Castles v Secretary to the Department of Justice and Others
• ZN (Afghanistan) and Others v Entry Clearance Officer and Another
• DS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Reid v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• In the matter of an application by Ngozi Christiana Okoye for Judicial Review
• R (Bibi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department R (Ali) v Same(Liberty and Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants intervening)
• JO (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R.q.k. (ap) For Judicial Review Of A Determination By The Secretary Of State For The Home Department In Terms Of The Immigration Rules
• Om For Judicial Review
• L.m. For Judicial Review
• Ervis Troci and Another v The Minister for Justice & Equality and Ors
• Re L (Vulnerable Adults with Capacity: Court's Jurisdiction) (No 2)

RELIED UPON in

• Omotunde (Best Interests) - Zambrano Applied - Razgar) Nigeria

APPLIED in

• LD (Article 8 - Best Interests of Child) Zimbabwe
• Patel v Entry Clearance Officer
• UE (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

FOLLOWED in

• Alli (A Minor) v Minister for Justice
• G O (A Minor) v Minister for Justice
• Pun and Others (Gurkhas—Policy—Article 8) Nepal

[See more]

• R (on the application of Quila and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [Sup Ct]
• HH v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa
• Min for Justice v Gorman

COMMENTED in

• Cosma v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2003] ACD 81
• [2003] INLR 543
• [2003] Imm AR 529

This document cites

---

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• R (Mahmood) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Kacaj (Article 3 – Standard of Proof – Non-State Actors)
• Edore v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Shala v Secretary of State for the Home Department



See all quotations

• R (Yogathas) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (L and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
• Asylum and Immigration Act 1996
• Immigration Act 1971
• Human Rights Act 1998