R (on the application of Glencore Energy UK Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
Linked as:
Extract
R (on the application of Glencore Energy UK Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
- Carltona Ltd v Comrs. of Works
- Harley Development Inc. and Another v Commissioner of Inland Revenue (Hong Kong)
- CC&C Ltd v HM Commissioners of Revenue & Customs
[See more]
APPLIES
- Mrs Karen Louise Oakley v South Cambridgeshire District Council Mr Len Satchell (Interested Party)
- Ex parte Preston (pet. all.)
CITES
- Re Waldron
- Lloyd v McMahon
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
[See more]
CONSIDERS
- Finance Act 2015
- Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981 - Articles : S-31
- Finance Act 2015 - Articles : S-80
REFERRED in
- Ong Keh Keong v Lembaga Tatatertib Peguam-Peguam
- R APS Short and Others v Police Misconduct Tribunal
- R Edyta Bukartyk v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CONSIDERED in
- R against Borders for Children (“ABC”) (by Wasi Daniju and Justin Baidoo) v The Secretary of State for Education
- R Manhattan Systems Ltd v HM Commissioners for Revenue and Customs
- John Walter Boulting v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
[See more]
APPLIED in
- Sportsdirect.com Retail Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC
- R (on the application of Archer and Another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
CITED in
- Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham QC v Uber London Ltd
- The King (on the application of Ben Peter Delo) v The Information Commissioner
FOLLOWED in
This document cites
- United States of America et al. v. Prudenza et al., (2007) 219 O.A.C. 369 (CA)
- Mrs Karen Louise Oakley v South Cambridgeshire District Council Mr Len Satchell (Interested Party)
- CC&C Ltd v HM Commissioners of Revenue & Customs
- Ex parte Preston (pet. all.)
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg