R (on the application of O) (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Linked as:
Extract
R (on the application of O) (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
DISAPPROVES
REFERS TO
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja
- R v Kluxen; R v Rostas and another
- The Queen (on the Application of OM Acting by Her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[See more]
RESUELVE RECURSO
APPLIES
AFFIRMS
CONSIDERS
- Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 - Articles : S-105
- Mental Health Act 1983 - Articles : S-48
- Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : SCH-3
[See more]
REFERRED in
- R (on the application of Ogechukwu Anugha) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Secretary of State for the Home Department (First Appellant) v R BA (Eritrea) (First Respondent)
- The Queen (on the application of Chernor Dede Bah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[See more]
CITED in
- R Son Le v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
- The Queen (on the application of Omed Abid) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
- The King on the Application of MP1 v Secretary of State for Defence
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- R Adegun v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Richard Aboro) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- The Queen (on the application of SB (Ghana)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[See more]
NOT APPLIED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
APPLIED in
This document cites
- Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
- R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja
- R v Kluxen; R v Rostas and another