R (J) v Worcester County Council (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [QBD]
Linked as:
Extract
R (J) v Worcester County Council (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [QBD]
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
- R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council; R (W) v Lambeth London Borough Council; R (A) v Same
- R BILKISU Mohammed v The London Borough of Barking & Dagenham
- R v Slough Borough Council, ex parte Ealing London Borough Council; R v Slough Borough Council, ex parte Jack; R v Ealing London Borough Council, ex parte Slough Borough Council; R v Hillingdon London Borough Council, ex parte Slough Borough Council
CONSIDERS
- R (on the application of Liverpool City Council) v Hillingdon London Borough Council
- Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-17
- Equality Act 2010
[See more]
DISTINGUISHES
RELIES UPON
- R (VC and Others) and Another v Newcastle City Council Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party)
- R v Northavon District Council, ex parte Smith (pet. all.)
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
This document cites
- R (on the application of Liverpool City Council) v Hillingdon London Borough Council
- The Queen ota S v Wandsworth
- R (VC and Others) and Another v Newcastle City Council Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party)
- R BILKISU Mohammed v The London Borough of Barking & Dagenham
- R v Slough Borough Council, ex parte Ealing London Borough Council; R v Slough Borough Council, ex parte Jack; R v Ealing London Borough Council, ex parte Slough Borough Council; R v Hillingdon London Borough Council, ex parte Slough Borough Council
